Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain Demonstrate Increased Lumbopelvic Muscle Stiffness Compared to Asymptomatic Controls
Women with chronic pelvic pain exhibited increased stiffness in five lumbopelvic muscles compared to asymptomatic controls, with decreased pressure pain threshold but no significant association between stiffness and pain sensitivity.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (62)
- Chronic Pelvic Pain: Prevalence, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Economic Correlates via openalex
- Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain via openalex
- Effects of an Individualized Comprehensive Rehabilitation Program on Impaired Postural Control in Women With Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial via openalex
- Endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain have similar impact on women, but time to diagnosis is decreasing: an Australian survey via openalex
- Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study across ten countries via openalex
- Is chronic pelvic pain a comfortable diagnosis for primary care practitioners: a qualitative study via openalex
- Limbic associated pelvic pain: A hypothesis to explain the diagnostic relationships and features of patients with chronic pelvic pain via openalex
- Multifactorial contributors to the severity of chronic pelvic pain in women via openalex
- Physical therapy in the management of women with chronic pelvic pain via openalex
- Prevalence of Chronic Pelvic Pain AmongWomen: An Updated Review via openalex
- W2005834055 via openalex
- W2022540918 via openalex
- W2024295786 via openalex
- W2046070069 via openalex
- W2049948810 via openalex
- W2050505320 via openalex
- W2053937221 via openalex
- W2064913337 via openalex
- W2070956946 via openalex
- W2079045535 via openalex
- W2081867684 via openalex
- W2089764140 via openalex
- W2101862056 via openalex
- W2106526549 via openalex
- W2110520059 via openalex
- W2113751151 via openalex
- W2117092285 via openalex
- W2130562956 via openalex
- W2144905022 via openalex
- W2157544713 via openalex
- W2259850434 via openalex
- W2316239754 via openalex
- W2336903569 via openalex
- W2590881865 via openalex
- W2613882892 via openalex
- W2626320794 via openalex
- W2649418345 via openalex
- W2733729193 via openalex
- W2748668660 via openalex
- W2767138123 via openalex
- W2767778381 via openalex
- W2775586357 via openalex
- W2795086007 via openalex
- W2799330499 via openalex
- W2804642616 via openalex
- W2912254745 via openalex
- W2960548474 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/2049463715584408 via openalex
- W2996116065 via openalex
- W2998445994 via openalex
- W3049183964 via openalex
- W4210753798 via openalex
- W2986710824 via openalex
- W1522329412 via openalex
- W1722826014 via openalex
- W1949517914 via openalex
- W1956168696 via openalex
- W1963771706 via openalex
- W1976214008 via openalex
- W1995657892 via openalex
- W1999448300 via openalex
- W2005434131 via openalex
Cited by (1)
SciLite annotations
organisms 3
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- scilite
- last seen: 2026-05-18T04:25:29.313245+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-13T06:26:10.529621+00:00