Bleeding Patterns of Oral Contraceptives with a Cyclic Dosing Regimen: An Overview
review
OA: gold
CC0
AI-generated summary
This review analyzes bleeding patterns from phase 3 trials of cyclic combined and progestin-only oral contraceptives, finding distinct patterns for each but noting difficulty in comparisons due to varied bleeding definitions.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Bleeding irregularities are one of the major reasons for discontinuation of oral contraceptives (OCs), and therefore clinicians need to set expectations during consultations. In this review we provide an overview of bleeding data of recently marketed cyclic combined OCs (COCs) and one progestin-only pill (POP). We evaluated data from phase 3 trials (≥12 months) used to gain regulatory approval. Overall, each type of OC has its own specific bleeding pattern. These patterns however were assessed by using different bleeding definitions, which hampers comparisons between products. In COCs, the estrogen balances the effects of the progestin on the endometrium, resulting in a regular bleeding pattern. However, this balance seems lost if a too low dose of ethinylestradiol (EE) (e.g., 10 µg in EE/norethindrone acetate 1 mg) is used in an attempt to lower the risk of venous thromboembolism. Replacement of EE by 17β-estradiol (E2) or E2 valerate could lead to suboptimal bleeding profile due to destabilization of the endometrium. Replacement of EE with estetrol (E4) 15 mg in the combination with drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg is associated with a predictable and regular scheduled bleeding profile, while the POP containing DRSP 4 mg in a 24/4 regimen is associated with a higher rate of unscheduled and absence of scheduled bleeding than combined products.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (4)
- Bleeding pattern and cycle control with an estradiol-based oral contraceptive: a seven-cycle, randomized comparative trial of estradiol valerate/dienogest and ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel 2009
- Efficacy and safety of a novel oral contraceptive based on oestradiol (oestradiol valerate/dienogest): A Phase III trial 2009
- Impact of estrogen type on cardiovascular safety of combined oral contraceptives 2016
- Efficacy and Safety of a Combined Oral Contraceptive Containing Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest: Results from a Clinical Study Conducted in North America 2013
References (41)
- Bleeding pattern and cycle control with an estradiol-based oral contraceptive: a seven-cycle, randomized comparative trial of estradiol valerate/dienogest and ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel via openalex
- Efficacy and Safety of a Combined Oral Contraceptive Containing Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest: Results from a Clinical Study Conducted in North America via openalex
- Efficacy and safety of a novel oral contraceptive based on oestradiol (oestradiol valerate/dienogest): A Phase III trial via openalex
- Impact of estrogen type on cardiovascular safety of combined oral contraceptives via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2007.05.081 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.10.010 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/13697130802054078 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2022.05.011 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2016.04.015 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/s13643-018-0766-x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70440-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003989.pub5 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2015.07.014 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e318250c3a0 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.001 via openalex
- W2060599869 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0010-7824(86)90006-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3182a1741c via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70047-x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2006.08.012 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/bf01849449 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2021.05.002 via openalex
- W2299177436 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2020.08.015 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.001 via openalex
- W6665636326 via openalex
- W6697774421 via openalex
- W7075597507 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2003.09.004 via openalex
- doi:10.3390/jcm10235625 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/17512433.2022.2054413 via openalex
- doi:10.2147/oajc.s85565 via openalex
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231856 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.conx.2020.100020 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16840 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/s12978-018-0561-0 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/13625187.2011.614029 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/13625187.2021.1987410 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2004.05.013 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2006.08.008 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/13625187.2012.677076 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-10T10:58:37.324591+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK