Transcatheter Ovarian Vein Embolization Using Coils for the Treatment of Pelvic Congestion Syndrome

In: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology · 2007 · vol. 30(4) , pp. 655–661 · doi:10.1007/s00270-007-9040-7 · PMID:17468903 · W2117039516
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 18 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-08

This study evaluated the effectiveness of ovarian vein embolization using coils for pelvic congestion syndrome, finding that 82% of patients experienced pain reduction and were satisfied with the procedure.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 · read from full text

This paper evaluated transcatheter ovarian vein embolization with coils in 67 multiparous women diagnosed with pelvic congestion syndrome, using medical record review and telephone interviews to compare pre- and post-procedure pelvic pain levels over follow-up intervals ranging from 3–6 months to 5–6 years. The main finding was that 82% (55/67) reported pain reduction and satisfaction without pursuing further treatment, while 18% (12/67) reported no change or worse pain, with 9 subsequently treated surgically and 3 remaining on continuous drug therapy. The authors’ approach relied on retrospective record and interview-based pain assessment and does not specify standardized pain measurement timing beyond the broad follow-up windows, which is a key limitation. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 4,980 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of ovarian vein embolization using coils for pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS), a common cause of chronic pelvic pain in multiparous women.

Methods

Between November 1998 and June 2005, 67 patients were diagnosed with PCS and underwent ovarian vein coil embolization. Through medical records and telephone interviews, the pre-embolization pain level and post-embolization pain control were assessed. In addition, in those cases where pain persisted after embolization or where patients were dissatisfied with the procedure, additional treatments and subsequent changes in pain scores were also analyzed. Evaluation after coil embolization was performed within 3–6 months (n = 3), 6 months to 1 year (n = 7), 1–2 years (n = 13), 2–3 years (n = 7), 3–4 years (n = 7), 4–5 years (n = 13), or 5–6 years (n = 17).

Results

Among a total of 67 patients, 82% (55/67) experienced pain reduction after coil embolization, were satisfied with the procedure, and did not pursue any further treatment. Twelve patients (18%, 12/67) responded that their pain level had not changed, or had become more severe. Among them, 9 patients were treated surgically and the remaining 3 patients remained under continuous drug therapy.

Conclusion

Ovarian vein embolization using coils is a safe and effective therapeutic method for treatment of PCS. It is thought that surgical treatment should be considered in cases where embolization proves ineffective. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Beard RW, Highman JH, Pearce S, et al. (1984) Diagnosis of pelvic varicosities in women with chronic pelvic pain. Lancet 27:946–949 Klock S (1995) Psychosomatic issues in obstetrics and gynecology. In: Rayans KJ, Barbieri RL (eds) Gynecology principles and practice. Mosby, St Louis, pp 399–402 Park SJ, Lim JW, Ko YT, et al. (2004) Diagnosis of pelvic congestion syndrome using transabdominal and transvaginal sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:683–688 Cordts PR, Eclavea A, Buckley PJ, et al. (1998) Pelvic congestion syndrome: Early clinical results after transcatheter ovarian vein embolization. J Vasc Surg 28:862–868 Taylor HC (1949) Vascular congestion and hyperaemia. I. Physiological basis and history of the concept. Am J Obstet Gynecol 57:211–230 Maleux G, Stockx L, Wilms G, Marchal G (2000) Ovarian vein embolization for the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome: Long-term technical and clinical results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11:859–864 Tarazov PG, Prozorovskij KV, Ryzhkov VK (1997) Pelvic pain syndrome caused by ovarian varices: Treatment by transcatheter embolization. Acta Radiol 38:1023–1025 Capasso P, Simons C, Trotteur G, et al. (1997) Treatment of symptomatic pelvic varices by ovarian vein embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 20:107–111 Kim HS, Malhotra AD, Rowe PC, et al. (2006) Embolotherapy for pelvic congestion syndrome: Long-term results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:289–297 Edwards RD, Robertson JR, MacLean AB, Hemmingway AP (1993) Case report: Pelvic pain syndrome—successful treatment of a case by ovarian vein embolization. Clin Radiol 47:429–431 Pieri S, Agresti P, Morucci M, de’ Medici L (2003) Percutaneous treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome. Radiol Med (Torino) 105:76–82 Bachar GN, Belenky A, Greif F, et al. (2003) Initial experience with ovarian vein embolization for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Isr Med Assoc J 5:843–846 Hodgkinson CP (1953) Physiology of the ovarian veins during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1:26–37 Adams J, Reginald PW, Franks S, et al. (1990) Uterine size and endometrial thickness and the significance of cystic ovaries in women with pelvic pain due to congestion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97:583–587 Reginald PW, Adams J, Franks S, et al. (1989) Medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of pelvic pain due to venous congestion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 96:1148–1152 Ahlberg NE, Barteley O, Childelkel N (1966) Right and left gonadal veins. An anatomical and statistical study. Acta Radiol Diagn 4:593–601 Belenky A, Bartal G, Atar E, et al. (2002) Ovarian varices in healthy female kidney donors: Incidence, morbidity, and clinical outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:625–627 Beard RW, Kennedy RG, Gangar KF, et al. (1991) Bilateral oophorectomy and hysterectomy in the treatment of intractable pelvic pain associated with pelvic congestion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 98:988–992 Mathis BV, Miller JS, Lukens ML, Paluzzi MW (1995) Pelvic congestion syndrome: A new approach to an unusual problem. Am Surg 61:1016–1018 Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Kwon, S.H., Oh, J.H., Ko, K.R. et al. Transcatheter Ovarian Vein Embolization Using Coils for the Treatment of Pelvic Congestion Syndrome. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30, 655–661 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-007-9040-7 Received: Accepted: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-007-9040-7

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (21)

Cited by (18)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:28:56.849735+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK