Tubal damage in infertile women: prediction using chlamydia serology

other OA: bronze public-domain-us
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study explores the relationship between serum chlamydia antibody titres (CATs) and detection of tubal damage in infertile women. METHODS: The tubal status and pelvic findings in 1006 women undergoing laparoscopy for infertility were related to CAT, which was measured using the whole-cell inclusion immunofluorescence test. RESULTS: A negative correlation between CAT and age was noted. A linear trend between serum CAT and the likelihood of tubal damage, including severe damage, was observed (P < 0.001). Titres in women with tubal damage (median 1:1024; range <1:64-1:4096) were significantly (P < 0.001) higher than in women with endometriosis alone (median <1:64; range <1:64-1:512) or those with a normal pelvis (median <1:64; range <1:64-1:1024). Women with positive titres were more likely to have pelvic adhesions than tubal occlusion unless titres were very high, when tubal damage was likely to be more severe. CONCLUSIONS: CATs are of predictive value in the detection of tubal damage and are quantitatively related to the severity of damage. For practical clinical purposes, Chlamydia serology is useful mainly as a screening test for the likelihood of tubal damage in infertile women and may facilitate decisions on which women should proceed with further investigations without delay.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

MeSH descriptors

Chlamydia Infections Chlamydia Infections Fallopian Tube Diseases Fallopian Tube Diseases Infertility, Female Serologic Tests Adult Aging Antibodies, Fungal Antibodies, Fungal Chlamydia Infections Chlamydia Infections Fallopian Tube Diseases Fallopian Tube Diseases Fallopian Tube Diseases Female Fluorescent Antibody Technique Fluorescent Antibody Technique Humans Infertility, Female

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:12:44.121522+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine