Transitional cell carcinoma of upper urinary tract vs. benign lesions: distinctive MSCT features
Multidetector CT can differentiate upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma from benign lesions by analyzing enhancement patterns, lesion location, urinary tract induration, and wall thickening.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This paper describes how transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the upper urinary tract can be recognized on CT urography, classifying tumors into papillary, infiltrating papillary, and diffusely infiltrating patterns, and comparing these with benign mimics. It reports that many TCCs show characteristic CT appearances but that several benign conditions can resemble specific TCC categories, including endometriosis and nephrogenic adenoma, mycetomas, malacoplakia, and inflammatory pseudotumor (similar to infiltrating papillary TCC), as well as complex/ passed urolithiasis, chronic obstruction with infection, atypical pyelonephritis, and tuberculosis (mimicking diffusely infiltrating TCC), with fibroepithelial polyp mimicking papillary TCC. Differential diagnosis is addressed using CT enhancement patterns, lesion location, urinary-tract induration, and the range of urinary wall thickening, with 3D reconstructed images considered useful. The paper notes this mimicry as a major diagnostic limitation requiring attention to these imaging signs. Relevance to endometriosis: endometriosis is explicitly listed as a benign lesion that can mimic infiltrating papillary TCC on CT, though the paper’s main focus is distinguishing upper urinary tract TCC from benign mimics using MSCT features.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
5,559 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-23T06:15:44.889181+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:14:30.652814+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine