{"paper_id":"52e6e0e7-9a81-4b06-9ea9-eca58dbb8b42","body_text":"Abstract\nThe transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the upper urinary tract is relatively uncommon. The clinical presentation of TCCs and many other diseases of the upper urinary tract are nonspecific, and most of these lesions are usually necessary to be evaluated by computed tomography (CT) urography. CT appearances of TCCs can be classified as papillary, infiltrating papillary, and diffusely infiltrating tumor. Most TCCs of the upper urinary tract can be identified on the bases of characteristic CT appearances. However, some benign lesions may mimic different categories of TCCs and should be taken into account for differentiating diagnosis. These lesions include endometriosis, nephrogenic adenoma, mycetomas, malacoplakia, and inflammatory pseudotumor which are similar to infiltrating papillary TCCs; complex urolithiasis, passed stone of ureter and ureteropelvic junction, chronic ureteropelvic junction obstruction with superimposed infection, atypical pyelonephritis, and tuberculosis which mimic diffusely infiltrating TCCs, and fibroepithelial polyp which has the same CT appearances as papillary TCCs. The useful CT signs to make differential diagnosis involve enhanced pattern, location of lesion, induration of urinary tract, and range of thickening of urinary wall. The three-dimension (3D) reconstructed images is useful in making differential diagnosis.\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nReferences\nHall MC, Womack S, Sagalowsky AI, et al. (1998) Prognostic factors, recurrence, and survival in transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a 30-years experience in 252 patients. Urology 52:594–601\nWong-You-Cheong JJ, Wagner BJ, Davis CJ Jr (1998) Transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 18:123–142\nSmith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA, et al. (1995) Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology 194:789–794\nKawashima A, Sandler CM, Goldman SM, et al. (1997) CT of renal inflammatory disease. Radiographics 17:851–866\nKawashima A, Sandler CM, Corl FM, et al. (2001) Imaging of renal trauma: a comprehensive review. Radiographics 21:557–574\nVan Der Molen AJ, Cowan NC, Mueller-Lisse UG, et al. (2008) CT urography: definition, indications and techniques. A guideline for clinical practice. Eur Radiol 18:4–17\nRamchandani P, Pollack HM (1995) Tumors of the urothelium. Semin Roentgenol 30:149–167\nTsili AC, Efremedis SC, Kalef-Ezra J, et al. (2007) Multidetector-row CT urography on a 16-row CT scanner in the evaluation of urothelial tumors. Eur Radiol 17:1046–1054\nCaoili EM, Cohan RH, Inampudi P, et al. (2005) MDCT urography for upper tract urothelial neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1873–1881\nLee TY, Ko SF, Wan YL, et al. (1997) Unusual imaging presentations in renal transitional cell carcinoma. Acta Radiol 38:1015–1019\nChapron C, Chopin N, Borghese B, et al. (2006) Deeply infiltrating endometriosis: pathogenetic implications of the anatomical distribution. Hum Reprod 21:1839–1845\nBazot M, Darai E (2005) Sonography and MR imaging for the assessment of deep pelvic endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:178–185\nBazot M, Darai E, Hourani R, et al. (2004) Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease. Radiology 232:379–389\nPeeker R, Aldenborg F, Fall M (1997) Nephrogenic adenoma: a study with special reference to clinical presentation. Br J Urol 80:539–542\nPorcaro AB, D’Amico A, Ficarra V, et al. (2001) Nephrogenic adenoma of the urinary bladder: our experience and review of the literature. Urol Int 66:152–155\nNakar C, Livny G, Levy I, et al. (2001) Mycetoma of the renal pelvis caused by Fusarium species. Pediatr Infect Dis J 20:1182–3\nEisenberg RL, Hedgcock MW, Shanser, JD (1977) Aspergillus mycetoma of the renal pelvis associated with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 118:466–7\nMcLean GK, Pollack HM, Banner MP (1979) The “stipple sign” urographic harbinger of transitional cell neoplasms. Urol Radiol 1:77–79\nNarla LD, Newman B, Spottswood SS, Narla S, Kolli R (2003) Inflammatory pseudotumor. Radiographics 23:719–729\nSugita R, Saito M, Miura M, Yuda F (1999) Inflammatory pseudotumour of the bladder: CT and MRI findings. Br J Radiol 72:809–811\nStanton MJ, Maxted W (1981) Malacoplakia: a study of the literature and current concepts of pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. J Urol 125:139–146\nBuckley JA, Urban BA, Soyer P, Scherrer A, Fishman EK (1996) Transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis: a retrospective look at CT staging with pathologic correlation. Radiology 201:194–198\nTamm EP, Silverman PM, Shuman WP (2003) Evaluation of the patient with flank pain and possible ureteral calculus. Radiology 228:319–329\nFoxman B (2002) Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs. Am J Med 113(suppl 1A):5S–13S\nStunell H, Buckley O, Feeney J, Geoghegan T, Browne RFJ, Torreggiani WC (2007) Imaging of acute pyelonephritis in the adult. Eur Radiol 17(7):1820–1828\nWang LJ, Wong YC, Chen CJ, Lim KE (1997) CT features of genitourinary tuberculosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:254–258\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nCorresponding author\nRights and permissions\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nWang, J., Wang, H., Tang, G. et al. Transitional cell carcinoma of upper urinary tract vs. benign lesions: distinctive MSCT features. Abdom Imaging 34, 94–106 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9418-2\nPublished:\nIssue date:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9418-2","source_license":"public-domain-us","license_restricted":false}