AB032. SOH23ABS_019. Conservative surgery versus colorectal resection for endometrial deposits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical and long-term outcomes

Desmond Chuah, Luke O’Brien, Ștefan Morărașu, Cillian Clancy, Bianca Codrina Morarasu, Paul Neary, Aoife O’Neill, Diego Raimondo, Renato Seracchioli
In: Mesentery and Peritoneum · 2023 · vol. 7 , pp. AB032 · doi:10.21037/map-23-ab032 · W4378906258
review OA: diamond CC0
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11 ⓘ

This meta-analysis compared perioperative and long-term outcomes for conservative surgery versus formal colorectal resection in treating colorectal endometriosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11 · read from full text ⓘ

This paper is a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing conservative surgery with colorectal resection for endometrial deposits, focusing on surgical and long-term outcomes. It synthesizes evidence across included studies, with the main reported result being the comparative assessment of outcomes between the two surgical approaches, while also acknowledging limitations typical of systematic reviews such as dependence on available study data (and the abstract does not provide specific quantitative findings here). The authors report no funding and declare no conflicts of interest. Relevance to endometriosis and adenomyosis: this paper is centrally about endometriosis — it specifically evaluates surgical management of colorectal involvement from endometrial deposits.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: The optimal surgical management of colorectal endometriosis is unclear. Conservative surgery by shaving or discoid excision of colorectal deposits facilitates organ preservation but is associated with an increased risk of recurrence. Formal colorectal resection is associated with higher rates of complications but may be associated with lower recurrence rates. This meta-analysis compares perioperative and long-term outcomes between conservative surgery (shaving or discoid excision) and formal colorectal resection.
Full text 1,332 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
AB032. SOH23ABS_019. Conservative surgery versus colorectal resection for endometrial deposits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical and long-term outcomes Acknowledgments Funding: None. Footnote Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Cite this abstract as: Chuah D, O’Brien L, Morarasu S, Clancy C, Morarasu BC, Neary P, O’Neill A, Raimondo D, Seracchioli R. AB032. SOH23ABS_019. Conservative surgery versus colorectal resection for endometrial deposits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical and long-term outcomes. Mesentery Peritoneum 2023;7:AB032.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK