{"paper_id":"526e1209-ab2b-4a2a-9e65-dda7614fe2c8","body_text":"AB032. SOH23ABS_019. Conservative surgery versus colorectal resection for endometrial deposits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical and long-term outcomes\nAcknowledgments\nFunding: None.\nFootnote\nConflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.\nEthical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.\nOpen Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.\nCite this abstract as: Chuah D, O’Brien L, Morarasu S, Clancy C, Morarasu BC, Neary P, O’Neill A, Raimondo D, Seracchioli R. AB032. SOH23ABS_019. Conservative surgery versus colorectal resection for endometrial deposits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical and long-term outcomes. Mesentery Peritoneum 2023;7:AB032.","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}