Transvaginal ultrasonography and endometrial histology in peri‐ and postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between endometrial thickness and endometrial histology in a large sample of women using HRT. DESIGN: Results from three multi-centre studies were combined. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred and sixty-four climacteric women were treated with either sequential, continuous combined or long-cycle therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The women underwent 717 examinations with both transvaginal ultrasonography and histological examination of the endometrium. Endometrial thickness was measured and associated with the histological findings. RESULTS: Eight cases of endometrial hyperplasia were diagnosed. All the hyperplasias were simple without atypia. Two cases had an endometrial thickness 8 mm. The > 4 mm threshold for abnormal endometrium had a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 47%, a positive predictive value of 2% and a negative predictive value of 99%. CONCLUSION: No association could be found between the endometrial thickness measured by transvaginal ultrasonography and endometrial pathology. In six out of eight women with simple hyperplasia the endometrium measured > 4 mm.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (2)
- Sonographic depiction of the endometrium during normal cycles 1986
- The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound scan in predicting endometrial hyperplasia and cancer in postmenopausal bleeding 1999
Cited by (1)
References (23)
- Sonographic depiction of the endometrium during normal cycles via openalex
- The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound scan in predicting endometrial hyperplasia and cancer in postmenopausal bleeding via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.271.9.703 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91640-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.06020108.x via openalex
- doi:10.3109/00016349309023423 via openalex
- doi:10.1056/nejm198610093151504 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006254-199602000-00014 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0378-5122(92)90064-b via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0002-9378(95)90483-2 via openalex
- W2803530681 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07365-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00000478-198307080-00011 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70445-x via openalex
- doi:10.1136/bmj.280.6217.822 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09066.x via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.280.17.1510 via openalex
- doi:10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480726 via openalex
- doi:10.7863/jum.1995.14.7.503 via openalex
- doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07050322.x via openalex
- doi:10.7326/0003-4819-117-12-1016 via openalex
- doi:10.1006/gyno.1996.4461 via openalex
- doi:10.1056/nejm199712183372502 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:03:29.626429+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK