Factors associated with postoperative recovery after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy
RCT
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This study investigated factors linked to postoperative recovery following laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy procedures.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the day-by-day recovery of general wellbeing was faster in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy than in total abdominal hysterectomy and to analyse the association between stress coping and sick-leave and the day-by-day recovery measured as general wellbeing.
STUDY DESIGN: A randomised multicentre trial conducted in five hospitals in the South East of Sweden. Hundred and twenty-five women scheduled for hysterectomy for benign conditions were enrolled in the study and 117 women completed the study. Fifty-five women were randomised to abdominal hysterectomy and 62 to laparoscopic hysterectomy. Day-by-day recovery of general wellbeing was measured by a visual analogue scale 1 week preoperatively, 35 days postoperatively, and during 1 week 6 months postoperatively. Stress-coping capability was measured preoperatively using a specific psychometric measurement. Sick-leave was granted with an initial period of 14 days and prolonged on patient demand with 7 days periods. Effects of operating method and stress-coping ability on the day-by-day recovery adjusted for postoperative complications and analgesics were analysed by means of analysis of variance for repeated measurements.
RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the day-by-day recovery of the general wellbeing between the operating methods. Stress-coping ability did significantly influence the day-by-day recovery of general wellbeing. Duration of sick-leave was associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications but not with stress-coping ability.
CONCLUSIONS: The day-by-day recovery of general wellbeing is not faster in laparoscopic hysterectomy than in abdominal hysterectomy. Women with high stress-coping abilities have a better outcome in general wellbeing than women with low stress-coping capacity. Identification of women with low stress-coping abilities and prevention of complications might be of benefit for improving postoperative wellbeing.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (2-hop)
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]
References (24)
- A prospective study of changes in negative mood states of women undergoing surgical hysterectomy: the relationship to cognitive predisposition and familial support via openalex
- A randomized trial comparing changes in psychological well-being and sexuality after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy via openalex
- Effectiveness of hysterectomy via openalex
- Psychological wellbeing after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy--a randomised controlled multicentre study via openalex
- Quality of life studies in unselected gynaecological outpatients and inpatients before and after hysterectomy via openalex
- Women’s Sense of Well-Being Before and After Hysterectomy via openalex
- W81621980 via openalex
- doi:10.1067/mob.2000.107731 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11398.x via openalex
- W6832942164 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/j.1600-0412.1998.770512.x via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003677.pub2 via openalex
- doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.1998.770512.x via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006250-199404000-00012 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/01674820600712172 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00579-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70667-8 via openalex
- doi:10.3310/hta8260 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003677.pub5 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11653.x via openalex
- doi:10.3109/00016349609033340 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13303.x via openalex
- doi:10.1192/bjp.154.4.516 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-14T06:55:14.750238+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:05:19.467219+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-17T06:24:38.187582+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK