Factors associated with postoperative recovery after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This study investigated factors linked to postoperative recovery following laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy procedures.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
ObjectivesTo determine whether the day-by-day recovery of general wellbeing was faster in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy than in total abdominal hysterectomy and to analyse the association between stress coping and sick-leave and the day-by-day recovery measured as general wellbeing.Study designA randomised multicentre trial conducted in five hospitals in the South East of Sweden. Hundred and twenty-five women scheduled for hysterectomy for benign conditions were enrolled in the study and 117 women completed the study. Fifty-five women were randomised to abdominal hysterectomy and 62 to laparoscopic hysterectomy. Day-by-day recovery of general wellbeing was measured by a visual analogue scale 1 week preoperatively, 35 days postoperatively, and during 1 week 6 months postoperatively. Stress-coping capability was measured preoperatively using a specific psychometric measurement. Sick-leave was granted with an initial period of 14 days and prolonged on patient demand with 7 days periods. Effects of operating method and stress-coping ability on the day-by-day recovery adjusted for postoperative complications and analgesics were analysed by means of analysis of variance for repeated measurements.ResultsNo significant difference was found in the day-by-day recovery of the general wellbeing between the operating methods. Stress-coping ability did significantly influence the day-by-day recovery of general wellbeing. Duration of sick-leave was associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications but not with stress-coping ability.ConclusionsThe day-by-day recovery of general wellbeing is not faster in laparoscopic hysterectomy than in abdominal hysterectomy. Women with high stress-coping abilities have a better outcome in general wellbeing than women with low stress-coping capacity. Identification of women with low stress-coping abilities and prevention of complications might be of benefit for improving postoperative wellbeing.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (24)
- A prospective study of changes in negative mood states of women undergoing surgical hysterectomy: the relationship to cognitive predisposition and familial support via openalex
- A randomized trial comparing changes in psychological well-being and sexuality after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy via openalex
- Effectiveness of hysterectomy via openalex
- Psychological Aspects of Hysterectomy via openalex
- Psychological wellbeing after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy—a randomised controlled multicentre study via openalex
- Quality of life studies in unselected gynaecological outpatients and inpatients before and after hysterectomy via openalex
- Women’s Sense of Well-Being Before and After Hysterectomy via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11398.x via openalex
- W6832942164 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/j.1600-0412.1998.770512.x via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003677.pub2 via openalex
- doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.1998.770512.x via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006250-199404000-00012 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/01674820600712172 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00579-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70667-8 via openalex
- doi:10.3310/hta8260 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003677.pub5 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11653.x via openalex
- doi:10.3109/00016349609033340 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13303.x via openalex
- W81621980 via openalex
- doi:10.1067/mob.2000.107731 via openalex
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-14T06:55:14.750238+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK