Uterine microbiome signatures associated with endometriosis

OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-09

Machine learning models using subtle uterine microbiome features from the proliferative phase showed modest diagnostic potential for endometriosis, though no robust individual microbial biomarkers were identified.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-09 · read from full text

This study analyzed uterine microbiomes from 266 tissue samples collected during the proliferative or secretory menstrual phases, using 16S rRNA gene sequencing at genus and sub-genus levels to test associations with endometriosis status. Variable Lactobacillus abundance was observed across individuals, Prevotella was borderline-enriched in proliferative-phase patients, and only a small number of differentially abundant sub-genus taxa showed changes that did not remain significant after FDR correction. Because individual biomarkers were not robust, the authors built a feature set integrating weakly differential taxa, algorithmically selected taxa via machine learning, and a functional dysbiosis score; a classifier trained on proliferative-phase data achieved moderate performance (AUC = 0.70), whereas secretory-phase models performed worse (AUC = 0.58). This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically, uterine microbiome signatures and how they differ by menstrual cycle phase to support endometriosis classification.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disorder affecting ~ 10% of reproductive-age women, often causing pelvic pain and infertility. Despite its prevalence, diagnosis remains delayed due to non-specific symptoms and lack of reliable non-invasive biomarkers. Emerging evidence implicates the microbiome in disease pathogenesis. RESULTS: We analyzed uterine microbiomes from 266 tissue samples collected during either the proliferative or secretory phase, using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Genus-level analysis revealed variable Lactobacillus abundance among all individuals. Prevotella showed borderline enrichment in proliferative-phase patients. Sub-genus analyses identified a small number of differentially abundant taxa, though none remained significant after FDR correction. To capture subtle microbial shifts, we developed a feature set combining weakly differential taxa, algorithmically selected taxa via machine learning, and a functional dysbiosis score. A supervised classifier trained on proliferative-phase data achieved moderate predictive performance (AUC = 0.70), while secretory-phase models performed more poorly (AUC = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: The uterine microbiome shows phase-dependent differences in its potential to inform endometriosis status. Although no robust individual microbial biomarkers were identified, machine learning models incorporating subtle community features from the proliferative phase yielded modest diagnostic potential. These results highlight the importance of menstrual cycle-aware sampling and support further development of microbiome-informed diagnostic tools for endometriosis.
Full text 5,467 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disorder affecting ~ 10% of reproductive-age women, often causing pelvic pain and infertility. Despite its prevalence, diagnosis remains delayed due to non-specific symptoms and lack of reliable non-invasive biomarkers. Emerging evidence implicates the microbiome in disease pathogenesis.

Results

We analyzed uterine microbiomes from 266 tissue samples collected during either the proliferative or secretory phase, using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Genus-level analysis revealed variable Lactobacillus abundance among all individuals. Prevotella showed borderline enrichment in proliferative-phase patients. Sub-genus analyses identified a small number of differentially abundant taxa, though none remained significant after FDR correction. To capture subtle microbial shifts, we developed a feature set combining weakly differential taxa, algorithmically selected taxa via machine learning, and a functional dysbiosis score. A supervised classifier trained on proliferative-phase data achieved moderate predictive performance (AUC = 0.70), while secretory-phase models performed more poorly (AUC = 0.58).

Conclusions

The uterine microbiome shows phase-dependent differences in its potential to inform endometriosis status. Although no robust individual microbial biomarkers were identified, machine learning models incorporating subtle community features from the proliferative phase yielded modest diagnostic potential. These results highlight the importance of menstrual cycle-aware sampling and support further development of microbiome-informed diagnostic tools for endometriosis. Similar content being viewed by others Abbreviations - BMI: - Body mass index - FDR: - False discovery rate - FDS: - Functional dysbiosis score - AUC: - Area under the curve - AI: - Artificial intelligence - rASRM: - Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their appreciation to Jonathan Zhao and Frank Zhang (both from HerAnova Lifesciences) for their insightful input on the study design and manuscript. Funding The research was funded by the internal R&D budget at HerAnova Lifesciences Inc, and by the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC2704003). Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding authors Ethics declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Women’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (IRB-20240110-R), and consent was given by enrolled participants. Consent for publication The enrolled participants provided informed consent for the use of their biological materials in research and publication. All authors have reviewed and approved this manuscript for publication. Competing interests All authors, except Zhang Xinmei and Zhu Libo, are employees of HerAnova Lifesciences, a company engaged in the commercial development of a non-invasive test for endometriosis. Farideh Z Bischoff, Yanqin Yu and Wing Hing Wong hold stock options of HerAnova Lifesciences. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise. Additional information Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Supplementary Information 12915_2026_2659_MOESM1_ESM.docx (download DOCX ) Additional file 1: Tables S1-S8. Table S1. Comparison of ALDEx2 results with MaAsLin2 in proliferative phase. Table S2. Selected taxa in proliferative cohort by random forest scoring. Table S3. Selected taxa in secretory cohort by random forest scoring. Table S4. Functional dysbiosis score of all participants. Table S5. Feature set of proliferative cohort. Table S6. Feature set of secretory cohort. Table S7. Clinical information of participants in the study. Table S8. Taxa identified in negative controls, including spike-in taxa. 12915_2026_2659_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (download XLSX ) Additional file 2: Figures S1-S2. Figure S1. Subgroup analysis stratified by disease stages. Figure S2. Within-group comparisons of proliferative and secretory phases. Rights and permissions Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. About this article Cite this article Zhu, L., He, J., Xu, X. et al. Uterine microbiome signatures associated with endometriosis. BMC Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-026-02659-8 Received: Accepted: Published: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-026-02659-8

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

SciLite annotations

organisms 2
paralactobacillus xylanibacter

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-14T06:11:53.302379+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-08-14T06:07:14.604116+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-06-28T09:31:30.222730+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-12T06:43:03.944938+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0