Research in Benign Gynaecology

Marie Gerval, Nick Panay
In: Introduction to Research Methodology for Specialists and Trainees · 2017 · pp. 235–254 · doi:10.1017/9781107585775.030 · W2736355734
book-chapter OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-06 ⓘ

This paper reviews current research in benign gynecology, covering topics from diagnostics to treatments and future directions.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-06 ⓘ

This paper is a chapter-length educational work that introduces research methodology for obstetrics and gynaecology specialists and trainees, covering topics such as time management, computer skills, information searching, critical appraisal, evidence-based medicine, clinical audit, study designs including randomized clinical trials, and research ethics and patient involvement. It outlines practical guidance for conducting and evaluating biomedical research, including aspects of data management, statistics, epidemiology, and how to write and present papers, with a stated caveat that no summary of findings is provided in the accessible preview because the content is methodological rather than an empirical study. The key contribution is the structured overview of how to plan, conduct, and report research across multiple domains of benign gynaecology and related areas. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (58)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-05T02:00:03.366016+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK