The Effect of Linzagolix on Bone Mineral Density (BMD): Safety Results From a Dose-Ranging Trial [21J]

In: Obstetrics & Gynecology · 2019 · vol. 133(1) , pp. 112S–113S · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000558837.48634.b6 · W2944331549
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10

Linzagolix treatment for 24 weeks showed dose-dependent decreases in bone mineral density, with losses less than 1% at 50 and 75 mg and up to 2.6% at 200 mg.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Linzagolix is a new, non-peptide, GnRH receptor antagonist being developed to treat endometriosis-associated pain (EAP). The EDELWEISS trial is a Phase 2b, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, dose-ranging trial in and Europe evaluating oral once daily doses of 50, 75, 100 and 200 mg taken for 24 weeks. Subjects randomized to placebo were crossed-over to 100 mg after 12 weeks. METHODS: IRB approval was obtained. Participants were women with surgically confirmed endometriosis and moderate to severe EAP. Women with a history of osteoporosis or other metabolic bone disease were excluded. BMD of the femoral neck, total hip and lumbar spine was assessed by DXA at baseline and after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment. Reading of DXA scans and monitoring of scan quality, including cross-calibration between sites, was centralized. RESULTS: 327 patients were randomized and treated. Mean percent (95% CI P value) BMD changes for lumbar spine from baseline to week 24 in the 50, 75, 100 and 200 mg dose groups were 0.137% (-0.83, -1.11 P=.777), -0.798% (-1.57, -0.03 P=.042), -1.365% (-2.14, -0.59, P<.001), -2.602% (-3.56, -1.65, P<.001), respectively. BMD of femoral neck and total hip showed a similar pattern but with generally smaller changes from baseline. CONCLUSION: Mean BMD losses at 24 weeks were <1% at doses of 50 and 75 mg and increased with increasing dose up to 2.6% for 200 mg. Long term use of 75 mg daily is not expected to require concomitant estrogen/progestin add-back therapy, while higher doses may require it.
Full text 1,782 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Introduction

Linzagolix is a new, non-peptide, GnRH receptor antagonist being developed to treat endometriosis-associated pain (EAP). The EDELWEISS trial is a Phase 2b, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, dose-ranging trial in and Europe evaluating oral once daily doses of 50, 75, 100 and 200 mg taken for 24 weeks. Subjects randomized to placebo were crossed-over to 100 mg after 12 weeks.

Methods

IRB approval was obtained. Participants were women with surgically confirmed endometriosis and moderate to severe EAP. Women with a history of osteoporosis or other metabolic bone disease were excluded. BMD of the femoral neck, total hip and lumbar spine was assessed by DXA at baseline and after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment. Reading of DXA scans and monitoring of scan quality, including cross-calibration between sites, was centralized.

Results

327 patients were randomized and treated. Mean percent (95% CI P value) BMD changes for lumbar spine from baseline to week 24 in the 50, 75, 100 and 200 mg dose groups were 0.137% (-0.83, -1.11 P=.777), -0.798% (-1.57, -0.03 P=.042), -1.365% (-2.14, -0.59, P<.001), -2.602% (-3.56, -1.65, P<.001), respectively. BMD of femoral neck and total hip showed a similar pattern but with generally smaller changes from baseline.

Conclusion

Mean BMD losses at 24 weeks were <1% at doses of 50 and 75 mg and increased with increasing dose up to 2.6% for 200 mg. Long term use of 75 mg daily is not expected to require concomitant estrogen/progestin add-back therapy, while higher doses may require it.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (2)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK