Assessment of persistent pelvic pain after hysterectomy: Neuropathic or nociceptive?

Cecilie Therese Hagemann, Unni Kirste, Unni Merete Kirste
Scandinavian journal of pain · 2016 · vol. 11(1) , pp. 127–129 · doi:10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.01.006 · PMID:28850452 · W2254597406
Other OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This study assessed patients experiencing persistent pelvic pain after hysterectomy, finding that eight out of sixteen patients showed sensory changes, with five likely experiencing neuropathic pain.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

In this issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Pain, Satu Pokkinen and coworkers report from a small prospective observational study of patients examined median 30 months after laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy for benign conditions in two hospitals in Tampere, Finland [1].The authors included patients who previously had participated in a questionnaire study, where as many as 26% of the responders (59 out of 227) reported pelvic pain 6 months after surgery [2].Those reporting pain were further invited to participate in this clinical follow-up study.However, only 16 patients were willing to be included.The reported post-operative clinical assessment included a gynaecological examination and a sensory examination performed by two different physicians.The gynaecological examination included inspection of the vulva and vagina, as well as a bimanual palpation of the pelvic area.The sensory examination of the lower abdomen/groin and the vulvar/perineal area was then performed by an anaesthesiologist specialised in pain medicine.A cotton stick was first used for assessing dysfunction in the low-threshold mechanoreceptor system (touch).Furthermore, the nociceptors/thermoreceptor system were tested using a special thermal roller instrument, as well as a pin prick with a wooden tooth pick.In each case, the patient was asked to compare from one site to another and rate the change on a numerical rating scale (NRS).The results were drawn on an illustrative sketch.Of the sixteen patients tested, 10 still reported pain in the questionnaire given before the examination.Eight patients had sensory changes (mostly hyperestesia) corresponding to the iliohypogastric, the genitofemoral or the ilioinguinal nerves verified by the different sensory tests performed, and equally distributed after vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy.A conclusion of probable neuropathic pain was drawn from five of these patients.Not surprisingly, the women in this cohort scored lower on health related quality of life scores than the average women in Finland.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Outcome instruments

NRS-pain

MeSH descriptors

Hysterectomy Pelvic Pain Female Humans Neuralgia Nociceptive Pain

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (20)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:20:29.702106+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-15T06:24:24.424788+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK