Results
In this study, the electrospinning technique was utilized to fabricate
PCL nanofibers to replicate the intricate ECM present in the uterus
myometrium. This method yielded nanofibers that closely mimic the
tissue’s ECM structure. Subsequently, the PCL nanofibers were
subjected to surface modification with galactose. The primary focus
of the SEM analysis was to investigate four distinct characteristics:
morphology, diameter, porosity, and orientation. Beginning with morphology,
in Figure 1 the nanofibers
displayed a smooth, bead-free structure in both random and aligned
configurations. Post modification, no significant roughness was observed.
Similarly to the previous study, post maltose conjugation using a
similar technique made the nanofiber’s surface smooth. 24 The treatment time plays a crucial role, as
the morphology will be damaged and the fibers will break if they are
treated for a longer time. 25 Regarding
diameter, the nanofiber measurements fell within the nanorange, i.e.,
1–1000 nm. The diameter of random PCL fibers was found to be
360.9 ± 151.3 nm, and aligned PCL fibers had 570.7 ± 219.53
nm. The diameter of the nanofibers is affected by the type of collector;
in aligned nanofibers, in order to obtain less deviation in alignment
angle, the rotating mandrel speed was set to 2000 rpm, which resulted
in the diameter variation, whereas random fibers resulted in a consistent
nanometer range. 26 Notably, after modification,
the morphology and diameter of the fibers changed slightly, random
fiber diameter was 395.6 ± 81.4 nm, and aligned fibers diameter
was 591.4 ± 304.1 nm.
SEM images of (A) PCL random (PCL-R), (B) PCL
aligned (PCL-A),
(C) GPCL-R, and (D) GPCL-A. (E–H) Histograms of fiber diameter
(minimum 100 fibers were measured) (E) PCL-R, (F) PCL-A, (G) GPCL-R,
and (H) GPCL-A. (I,J) Histograms showing the alignment of nanofibers.
Through image analysis software (ImageJ), the porosity
of both
aligned and random fibers was quantified. As shown in Table 2 , it is noteworthy that aligned
fibers exhibited lower porosity compared with random fibers. Specifically,
random fibers demonstrated a porosity of 13.8%, while aligned fibers
displayed a porosity of 4.5%. After surface modification, galactose
PCL random (GPCL-R) has 11.6% and galactose PCL aligned (GPCL-A) has
7% of porosity, respectively. Aligned fibers are densely packed when
compared to random fibers; therefore, their porosity is reduced. 27 Figure 1 I,J shows that the angle of alignment for the fibers is approximately
0.30 ± 7.24° for aligned fibers, and for random fibers,
the alignment is not in a single direction, but most of the fibers
were around 36.90 ± 11.90°. The above results indicate that
aminolysis and galactose treatment had no remarkable effect on morphology,
whereas diameter increased slightly when compared to unmodified PCL.
This slight increase in diameter may be attributed to the tendency
of nanofibers to form fused structures during surface modification,
which consequently led to a slight increase in diameter and porosity. 28 These findings align with similar studies; for
instance, in our previous study 24 we reported
that aminolysis and sugar conjugation did not affect the surface morphology
of fibers, and the diameter did not change. In addition, in a study
by Amoures de Sousa et al., no alteration was found in the morphology
of PCL nanofibers following the modification. 68
The process of aminolysis
involves breaking ester bonds present on PCL, leading to the generation
of amide bonds. This study utilizes 1,6-hexanediamine to perform this
reaction on PCL. This reaction results in one amino group, reacting
with the –COO– group to establish a covalent –CONH–
bond, while the second amino group remains unreacted and free. This
available free amino group is subsequently used to conjugate galactose;
this reaction is an intermediate step for galactose conjugation. 28 − 31
The confirmation test for the presence of a free amino group
on the surface was achieved through the ninhydrin test. The ninhydrin
(triketohydrindene hydrate) test, a simple and sensitive assay, works
on the basis of reacting with the primary amino group to produce a
colored product known as diketohydrindylidene-diketohydrindamine (Ruhemann’s
Purple), as shown in Figure 2 B. 20 As represented in Figure 2 A, the amine concentration
of the samples was calculated using the standard curve obtained using
1,6 hexanediamine. Aminolyzed random fibers showed 42.6 ± 0.6
μg/mL and aligned fibers showed 28.6 ± 1.2 μg/mL
of amine concentration. Since random fibers are more porous, and aminolysis
occurs in depth in the Z direction; the amount of
amine groups is higher on random fibers when compared to aligned fibers. 31 On GPCL-R fibers, it decreased to 7.7 ±
0.4 μg/mL and in GPCL-A, it decreased to 8.4 ± 0.4 μg/mL,
which is similar to unmodified random and aligned PCL fibers, which
had 7.2 ± 0.2 and 6.3 ± 0.2 μg/mL of amine concentration,
respectively. A similar decrease in the percentage of amine groups
after conjugation with galactose and maltose was also observed in
a few other studies. 21 , 22 The NH 2 group participates
in the conjugation of galactose; therefore, free amine groups are
not available to react with the ninhydrin reagent. 32
(A) Quantification of amine groups using the ninhydrin assay on
PCL-R, APCL-R, GPCL-R, PCL-A, APCL-A, and GPCL-A (*** p < 0.001). (B) Macroscopic picture of ninhydrin reaction color
transition on the surface-modified scaffold. Scale bar = 100 μm.
(C) ELLA-HRP-conjugated assay quantification of the galactose moiety
(**** p < 0.0001). (D) ELLA-FITC conjugated assay-quantitative
analysis of the galactose moiety (**** p < 0.0001).
(E) Fluorescent images of the ELLA-FITC assay on (i) PCL-R, (ii) PCL-A,
(iii) GPCL-R, and (iv) GPCL-A nanofibers.
Carbohydrates can only perform
their biochemical role if they are exposed to the appropriate receptors. 33 Galactose is conjugated on the surface by using
lactose sugar. Lactose sugar has two components, glucose and galactose.
Glucose attaches to free amine groups, and galactose is present on
top. Therefore, to confirm the galactose moiety on the top of the
surface, an ELLA assay is performed. Both quantitatively and qualitatively,
the galactose moiety present is calculated using HRP and FITC-conjugated
peanut lectin from A. hypogaea . To
quantitatively measure the quantity of galactose, we used a standard
curve of lectin. As shown in Figure 2 C, the galactose content is determined to be 106.2
± 0.12 μg/mL on random nanofibers and 110.9 ± 0.4
μg/mL on aligned nanofibers. To qualitatively see the spread
of galactose on the surface, the FITC-conjugated ELLA assay was done.
We can clearly differentiate between galactose-conjugated intensity
in Figure 2 E(iii,iv)
on the scaffolds conjugated with galactose compared to the unmodified
scaffolds in Figure 2 E(i,ii), and the intensity of the fluorescence is calculated and
depicted in graph Figure 2 D. This confirms the presence of a galactose moiety on top
of the fibers surface.
Surface wettability,
referred to as hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity, stands as a critical
factor influencing various cellular behaviors. The degree of wettability
of the scaffolds was determined through water contact angle measurements,
a reliable parameter that measures how readily water droplets spread
on the nanofibrous surface. 34 The results
of the contact angle shown in Table 3 show that unmodified PCL-R fibers exhibited hydrophobic
traits, with a left contact angle of 134.94 ± 3.31° and
right contact angle of 135.52 ± 3.09°. On the other hand,
galactose-conjugated PCL surfaces display reduced contact angles,
with a left angle of 77.85 ± 8.0° and a right angle of 78.14
± 3.9°. Similarly, aligned PCL fibers show a right angle
of 127.63 ± 3.09° and a left angle of 128.4 ± 3.2°,
while galactose-conjugated aligned PCL surfaces exhibit even further
reduction to 64.63 ± 8.0 and 65.14 ± 3.9° of left and
right angles, respectively. The surface modification involving galactose
results in the introduction of hydroxyl groups and an increase in
surface energy, consequently enhancing hydrophilicity. 35 Additionally, it was observed in Figure 3 iB,D that water droplets spread
more rapidly on galactose-grafted PCL surfaces and were quickly absorbed
upon contact. This phenomenon promotes the attachment of negatively
charged cells to the surface of the modified PCL fibers. 36 Furthermore, scaffold alignment revealed a different
range of wettability. Aligned scaffolds demonstrated increased hydrophobicity
compared with randomly oriented scaffolds. The aligned fibers, being
compactly packed, yield lower porosity in contrast to the loosely
arranged, highly porous random fibers, which influence the wettability. 37
(i) Contact angle of (A) PCL-R, (B) GPCL-R, and (C) PCL-A, (D)
GPCL-A nanofibers. (ii) Mechanical properties of unmodified PCL-R,
PCL-A, and modified GPCL-R and GPCL-A scaffolds. (A) Representative
stress–strain curves. (B) Tensile strength and elongation at
break. Data are presented as average ± standard deviation ( n = 3). (iii) Degradation rate of nanofibers: (A) PCL-R,
(B) PCL-A, (C) GPCL-R, (D) GPCL-A, and (iv) Water uptake kinetics
of nanofibers (A) PCL-R, (B) PCL-A, (C) GPCL-R, and (D) GPCL-A.
The mechanical
properties of random and aligned nanofibers with modifications were
compared using a universal tensile testing machine. As observed in Figure 3 iiA, galactose-modified
scaffolds have demonstrated good elasticity along with moderate tensile
strength. Random galactose-modified PCL showed the highest tensile
strength of 0.041 ± 0.01 MPa when compared to random unmodified
PCL with 0.026 ± 0.01 MPa, aligned unmodified PCL with 0.011
± 0.001 MPa and aligned modified PCL with 0.016 ± 0.002
MPa of tensile strength, respectively. Together, the galactose-conjugated
scaffolds, both random and aligned fibers’ tensile strengths
were improved when compared to unmodified fibers, indicating that
the chemical treatment did not make the scaffolds brittle. Due to
random nanofiber orientation, the nanofibers could be drawn out or
stretched relatively easily via deformation under the applied stress. 38
The analysis, as seen in Figure 3 iiB, also reveals that random
PCL unmodified showed 28 ± 13.3% elongation at break when compared
to modified PCL, which shows 49.5 ± 11.6%. Similarly, in aligned
unmodified, an elongation at break of 65.3 ± 14.1%, and in aligned
modified, 91.3 ± 15.4% elongation at break was observed. In general,
materials with higher tensile strength tend to have lower elongation
at break, and vice versa. This is because materials that are very
strong and rigid (high tensile strength) are less likely to deform
or elongate significantly before breaking, whereas materials that
are more flexible and ductile (low tensile strength) can stretch and
deform more before reaching their breaking point. 39
Scaffold
degradation is essential in tissue engineering as it facilitates the
gradual breakdown of the scaffold over time, promoting the growth
and regeneration of new tissue. 40 Under
physiological conditions, PCL undergoes degradation via ester bond
cleavage through hydrolysis. 41 Therefore,
water uptake influences the degradation and mechanical properties
of the polymer. 42 The aim of this experiment
is to compare the water uptake and degradation behavior of electrospun
PCL nanofibers with and without surface modification, as degradation
rates are influenced by the structure, geometry of the polymers, and
surface area. 43 Figure 3 iii,iv presents the weight loss percentage
and water absorption of electrospun PCL nanofiber surface-modified
and unmodified, respectively. Both modified and unmodified scaffolds
remained almost unchanged during the degradation period, with both
absorption and weight loss remaining very low after 21 days. PCL-R
fibers showed 8% uptake at 21 days, while surface-modified scaffolds
showed 12% uptake. Similarly, PCL-A fibers showed 7% uptake, whereas
surface-modified scaffolds showed 13% uptake, as depicted in Figure 3 iii. The higher the
water uptake, the higher the degradation that was observed, particularly
in GPCL-A. However, there was not much difference in the morphology
of fibers observed, as shown in Supporting Figure S1 .
The proliferation of primary
HUF on galactose-conjugated nanofibers was evaluated after days 1,
7, and 14 time points. The number of live cells on PCL unmodified
and modified was similar at the first day time point. The cell viability
on the surface of modified scaffolds increased significantly as compared
with unmodified scaffolds after all the time points. In Figure 4 A, it is evident that the absorbance
of PCL-R and PCL-A on days 7 and 14 is lower than that on day 1. The
decrease in absorbance of PCL-R and PCL-A over time may be attributed
to several factors, including potential cell confluence, nutrient
depletion, or metabolic changes. MTT results also suggest that the
modified scaffolds are not toxic to cells and, therefore, are cytocompatible.
Moreover, these results imply that enhanced cell proliferation contributes
to improved regenerative potential. 22 While
galactose-grafted scaffolds exhibited superior proliferation rates
of HUF cells compared with the unmodified PCL scaffolds, this outcome
aligns with our expectations. The lack of significant changes in the
absorbance of GPCL-A and GPCL-R could be indicative of the enhanced
performance of the galactose-grafted scaffolds in maintaining cell
viability and supporting prolonged cell proliferation. The interaction
between the galactose moiety and cell receptors promoted enhanced
cell attachment, resulting in significantly higher proliferation rates
at all time points. These findings affirm the preference of HUF cells
for a hydrophilic surface. 44 This is because
galactose acts as a cellular matrix adhesive component and triggers
the cellular response. Galectin receptors present on fibroblasts are
activated, and cell proliferation has increased. 45 , 46
(A)
MTT assay using human uterine fibroblasts on TCPS, PCL-R, PCL-A,
GPCL-R, and GPCL-A nanofibers on days 1, 7, and 14 of culture (* p < 0.05), (*** p < 0.0001). (B) Live/dead
assay with human uterine fibroblasts seeded on TCPS, PCL-R, GPCL-R,
PCL-A, and GPCL-A scaffolds. (C) Quantification of live cells (green)
in live dead assay for viability percentage.
The live-dead test
was performed on two-day points, day 1 and day 3. All the scaffolds
had very few dead cells, and the difference in morphology on each
scaffold could be visualized in Figure 4 B. Similar to the TCPS control, most of the cells on
the scaffolds were not stressed or dead. It was also noted that the
cells seeded on aligned nanofibers exhibited elongation and alignment
similar to nanofiber orientation, closely resembling the underlying
scaffold morphology. These results in Figure 4 B clearly indicate that the topology of the
PCL scaffold has the ability to influence the orientation of cell
growth and spreading. 47 On random unmodified
and galactose-modified PCL scaffolds, cells tend to spread randomly
in all directions. Using the ImageJ software directionality plugin,
the degree of direction was calculated, and it was observed that on
PCL-A and GPCL-A scaffolds, on day 3, cells are observed to align
themselves at an angle of approximately 5 and 16°, respectively.
This study suggests that after 3 days of culture, cells exhibit elongation
along the direction of the nanofibers, possibly in response to the
detected convex curvature of the cylindrical nanofiber structures.
Given that aligned fibers mimic the ECM structure of the uterine myometrial
layer, they may be a preferred choice over random fibers for certain
applications.
Phalloidin
staining is used for staining F-actin filaments, which are an important
component of the cytoskeleton. The F-actin protein plays a major role
in cells as a structural and translocation protein. Numerous signals,
such as growth factors, ECM, and chemokines, cause cytoskeletal rearrangement. 48 In this study, the scaffold properties might
have caused a change within the cells and caused the rearrangement
of f-actin. Therefore, to study the change in the cytoskeleton, this
staining was done.
To assess the cellular morphology and the
arrangement of their actin cytoskeleton on the scaffolds, cells were
stained with phalloidin and examined using a fluorescence microscope.
The findings, depicted in Figure 5 , revealed that the number of cells on unmodified PCL
appeared comparatively lower than on the modified counterpart. This
observation depicts the impact of the scaffold’s hydrophobic
properties on cellular adhesion and distribution. In various recent
investigations, it has been shown that cell attachment and spreading
are more pronounced on hydrophilic surfaces with positive amine modifications
compared to hydrophobic surfaces, under conditions with or without
the presence of serum. 49
(A) Immunofluorescence
assay using DAPI (blue), Rhodamine Phalloidin
(red), and Versican (green) for the human uterine fibroblast cells
on the modified and unmodified surfaces of the scaffolds after 2 days
of culture. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Quantification of fluorescence
intensity of Versican (green).
Versican is one of the major proteoglycans expressed
by cultured
fibroblasts and present in the ECM of smooth muscle tissue. 50 It helps in the binding of hyaluronan via the
amino terminal. It also has several other domains to bind to, including
lectin, epidermal growth factor, and complement regulatory proteins.
The major role of Versican is that it helps in cell adhesion and modulation
of the ECM. 51 To visualize the distribution
of Versican in HUFs since it plays a major role in cell phenotype
and cell migration, this staining was performed. In Figure 5 , it was observed that the
morphology and expression of Versican were observed on scaffolds similar
to the TCPS. Surface-modified scaffolds exhibited improved expression
of Versican by providing amino-terminal groups.
To investigate
the impact of galactose conjugation and lectin-based cell–fiber
interactions on mimicking trophoblast invasion, cell growth, and potential
ECM remodeling, we conducted gene expression experiments. Our hypothesis
revolved around the concept of l -selectin-based interactions
and potential ECM remodeling. RNA was isolated after 7 and 14 days
of culture of HUFs on the scaffolds, and CDNA was prepared. Versican,
collagen, laminin, and galectin genes were studied using primers mentioned
in Table 1 . Galectin
3, a member of the lectin family, possesses unique characteristics
for glycan binding. It serves as a versatile regulator of crucial
biological processes, including cell adhesion, growth, proliferation,
and differentiation. 52 They also play a
role in mediating cell-to-ECM heterotypic adhesion processes. Existing
literature suggests that modulating galectin-3 functions can either
enhance or diminish cell adhesion to ECM protein ligands like laminin,
collagen type IV, and fibronectin. 53 Additionally,
galectin-3 contributes to wound healing and cell re-epithelialization
and plays a critical role in modulating interactions between cells
and the ECM during wound re-epithelialization. 54 , 55 Studies by Bevan et al. confirmed the presence of beta- d -galactoside-binding lectins in the uterine wall, while experiments
by Vicovac et al. indicated that galectin-1 and galectin-3 are predominantly
found in the placental bed of the uterus, where trophoblast attachment
occurs. Galectins also play a role in organizing the ECM and presenting
ECM ligands to surface receptors on migrating cells, whether of trophoblastic
or bone marrow origin. 56 , 57 Our qPCR results in Figure 6 A revealed that galectin
3 genes are expressed and upregulated after day 7, peaking at day
14 in galactose-modified scaffolds, particularly in GPCL-R compared
to GPCL-A. This upregulation of galectin 3 corresponds to phases of
cell proliferation and differentiation. In fibroblast culture, exogenous
galectin-3 has been reported to stimulate cell proliferation. 58 Inohara et al. reported that galectin-3 acts
as a mitogen, capable of stimulating fibroblast cell proliferation
in a paracrine manner through interactions with cell surface glycoconjugates. 59
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR gene expression analysis
of ECM protein
genes. (A) Galectin 3, (B) Versican, (C) laminin, (D) collagen I,
and (E) collagen III (* p < 0.05) (**** p < 0.0001).
In Figure 6 B, Versican,
a substantial chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan known for binding hyaluronan
and forming extensive ECM aggregates, can influence critical physiological
processes such as cell proliferation, adhesion, and migration in the
endometrium. It also plays a role in embryo attachment. 60 We observed significant changes in the expression
of Versican on both day 7 and day 14 in galactose-conjugated random
and aligned PCL scaffolds. In Figure 6 C, laminin, another ECM protein present in the uterus,
is typically found in the myometrium and endometrium as part of the
basement membranes, particularly in nonpregnant uteri. During embryo
attachment and invasion, laminin interacts with trophoblasts. 61 Therefore, laminin expression is associated
with cellular differentiation, adhesion, and growth. 62 Our study indicated increased laminin expression on day
14 in both modified random and aligned PCL scaffolds, particularly
when compared to unmodified scaffolds. 54 − 57 , 59
The ECM of the uterus is characterized as a fiber-reinforced
composite
viscoelastic material primarily composed of fibrillar collagen, with
approximately two-thirds being type I collagen and one-third being
type III collagen. 63 It is important to
note that the relative composition of collagen types significantly
influences the mechanical properties of the tissues. Maintaining an
appropriate balance between collagen types I and III is crucial for
preserving the functional integrity of various tissues. An increase
in the collagen I/III ratio results in heightened tissue rigidity,
whereas a decrease enhances tissue elasticity. 64 In our study, as shown in Figure 6 D,E, we observed significant expression of
collagen I in treated scaffolds when compared to collagen III.
In conclusion, our study highlights the profound impact of lectin
and galactose conjugation on galactose-conjugated scaffolds. These
modifications have shown remarkable improvements in the expression
of key ECM components, including galectin, Versican, and laminin.
These enhancements in ECM expression signify the potential of these
modified scaffolds to mimic trophoblast invasion, promote cell growth,
and potentially contribute to ECM remodeling.
Surface-modified nanofibrous scaffolds (1 × 1 cm 2 ) were implanted into adult Wistar rats to evaluate their in vivo
biocompatibility. Rats ( n = 3) were subcutaneously
implanted with the materials, as shown in Figure 7 and assessed 21 days postimplantation. Continuous
monitoring for local inflammation was conducted, including macroscopic
and histological evaluations for signs of inflammation and foreign
body responses. Throughout the observation period, the rats exhibited
normal behavior, and no indications of local inflammation, implant
exposure, extrusion, or mortality were observed. Upon macroscopic
examination at the time of retrieval, the implants were surrounded
by healthy, unaffected tissue devoid of inflammation markers such
as redness, swelling, or any adverse tissue reactions that could compromise
the integrity of the implanted area.
(i) Illustration of steps involved in
implanting both modified
and unmodified scaffolds in the subcutaneous region of Wistar rats.
(ii) Evaluation of tissue integration for the modified and unmodified
scaffolds after a 21 day subcutaneous implantation in Wistar rats
( n = 3) using H&E staining, with the following
categories: (A) control, (B) PCL-R, (C) PCL-A, (D) GPCL-R, and (E)
GPCL-A. The arrow indicates the muscle layer damage region. (iii)
Masson’s trichome staining to assess tissue samples for collagen
and scar formation on (A) control, (B) PCL-R, (C) PCL-A, (D) GPCL-R,
and (E) GPCL-A. (iv) Quantitative analysis of collagen expression
intensity on the scaffolds after Masson’s trichome staining.
H&E staining
is a commonly used technique to visualize the morphology of cells
and tissues. In the current study, the region of tissue was evaluated,
and the degree of damage is classified into three groups: intact,
mild, and severe, as shown in Table 4 . Table 5 illustrates the degree of damage or intactness in the subcutaneous
tissue at the implanted location. 65 In Figure 7 iiB,D, the muscle
layer of the PCL-R nanofibers and PCL-R galactose-conjugated nanofibers
implanted site showed mild damage. Mild damage to tissue may be characterized
by the presence of inflammatory cells, such as neutrophils or lymphocytes,
in the affected area. Additionally, there may be changes in the arrangement
of cells or the ECM, such as disorganization or increased fibrosis.
However, mild damage may not necessarily cause significant changes
in tissue morphology or function, and the tissue may still be capable
of repair and regeneration. Whereas in Figure 7 iiC, PCL-A showed severe damage at the site,
which is due to extensive changes in the tissue architecture and cellular
morphology. Severe tissue damage may be characterized by the presence
of large areas of necrosis, the loss of normal tissue structure, and
the infiltration of immune cells, such as neutrophils, macrophages,
and lymphocytes. In contrast, PCL-A scaffolds conjugated with galactose Figure 7 iiE exhibited significantly
less damage, indicating that surface modification mitigates adverse
effects and enhances scaffold biocompatibility.
Collagen is a major component of the ECM in connective tissues, including
subcutaneous tissue, and is produced by fibroblasts in response to
injury or foreign material. 66 The presence
of high levels of collagen in the subcutaneous tissue surrounding
the nanofiber implant indicates that the tissue is undergoing a healing
response and attempting to isolate the foreign material by forming
a fibrous capsule around it. This is a common response to implantable
materials and is known as the foreign body response in the first few
days after implantation. Whereas in PCL-A unmodified nanofiber samples,
a notably higher level of collagen content was observed and quantified
from the stained images. The observation of increased collagen content
in tissue post implantation of polymer nanofibers suggests that these
nanofibers have incited a fibrotic reaction within the tissue, as
visually represented in Figure 7 iiib,c for the unmodified samples. Additionally, the quantification
of collagen intensity revealed higher levels in unmodified PCL-A,
as shown in Figure 7 iv. While some degree of fibrosis is a normal and expected response
to biomaterial implants, excessive fibrosis can impede the integration
of the implant with the surrounding tissue, leading to decreased functionality
and potential complications. 67 The modified
scaffolds did not cause an excessive degree of fibrosis; therefore,
the amount of collagen is similar to the control.
Materials
Poly(ε-caprolactone)
(Mn = 80,000) pellets were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The solvents
chloroform and methanol to dissolve PCL were obtained from Himedia
Co. For the preparation of the 10% (w/v) solution, the first PCL pellets
were added to chloroform and stirred for 15 min. Later, to the same
solution, methanol was added in the ratio of 4:1 and kept for 12 h
stirring at room temperature until the pellets were dissolved completely. 16
Nanofibers were produced
using an electrospinning unit (Model-HO-NFES-040) with a set of optimized
parameters. The electrospinning parameters were optimized and described
in a prior study by our group. 16 A 10 mL
syringe containing polymer was set, and a voltage of 18 kV was applied.
A needle with a gauge of 24G was used, and a constant distance of
20 cm was maintained between the needle tip and the collector, while
the flow rate was accurately held at 0.002 mL/min. A rotating mandrel
with a speed of 2000 rpm was used for aligned fibers. The electrospinning
was carried out for 24 h to obtain a single mat of random or aligned
fibers. The random fibers and aligned fibers collected on the stationary
and rotating mandrels were stored in a vacuum desiccator for further
characterization.
The surface
modification of PCL nanofibers was done by conjugating the surface
of the nanofibers with galactose in two steps.
PCL nanofibrous
mats obtained are cut into pieces measuring 1 × 1 cm. To eliminate
oil or other dirt on scaffolds, it was immersed in an alcohol–water
(1:1, v/v) solution, washed with deionized water, and dried. Fibers
were then immersed in a 10% 1,6-hexane diamine/2-propanol solution
overnight at 37 °C, rinsed with deionized water to remove any
unattached or excess 1,6-hexane diamine, and dried. 16
To conjugate
galactose on the aminated scaffolds, the aminated discs were soaked
in 100 mL of citrate buffer solution overnight containing 1.88 g of
sodium cyanoborohydride (NaBH3CN) and 21.61 g of galactose, with a
pH of 6.1, following the neo glycosylation protocol from ref ( 22 ).
Morphology and post
surface modification structure of electrospun fibers were analyzed
using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Carl Zeiss Ultra 55, CeNSE,
IISc Bangalore). Prior to analysis, samples were desiccated for 24
h in a desiccator to remove any solvents present and then gold sputter-coated
to apply a conductive layer before mounting. Analysis was conducted
at magnifications of 75K, 25K, and 5K X at an accelerating voltage
of 5 kV. SEM images were utilized for fiber diameter and orientation
analyses using ImageJ software.
Post-aminolysis,
a ninhydrin assay was performed to quantify the presence of amine
groups. Ninhydrin reagent (1 M) prepared in 10 mL of ethanol was added
to the scaffold discs. Scaffolds were incubated in 100 μL of
ninhydrin solution in a hot water bath at 70 °C for 15 min. Subsequently,
the tubes were allowed to cool to room temperature. To dissolve the
scaffolds, 500 μL of chloroform and isopropyl alcohol were added
to the tubes. From this solution, 100 μL was transferred to
96-well plates, and the intensity was measured at a wavelength of
562 nm using a spectrophotometer [PerkinElmer (Ensight) multimode
plate reader HH34000000].
To quantitatively and qualitatively assess the amount of galactose
conjugated on the nanofiber’s surface, two types of ELLA assays
were conducted. In the first assay, a lectin with FITC fluorescence
was used (FITC-ELLA). In the second assay, a lectin conjugated with
horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was employed. For the FITC-ELLA assay,
PCL and galactose-conjugated PCL samples were suspended in a phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) solution containing FITC-conjugated lectin from Arachis hypogaea (peanut lectin) (Sigma-Aldrich L7381)
at a concentration of 40 μg/mL. The samples were then stirred
in the dark for 2 h. After this incubation, they were washed with
PBS. Subsequently, the samples were examined for their fluorescence
using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse-TE2000-U).
The
HRP-ELLA assay involved treating PCL and galactose-conjugated PCL
samples with a 2% BSA solution in PBS (100 μL) and shaking them
at 5 °C for 14 h. Subsequently, the samples were incubated at
room temperature with a solution of peanut lectin conjugated to HRP
(Sigma-Aldrich, L7759) (0.01 mg/mL, 200 μL) in PBS (200 μL)
for 2 h with shaking. After incubation, excess unbound lectin was
removed by thorough washing with PBS. Next, the samples were treated
with a solution of OPD ( o -phenylenediamine dihydrochloride)
(SIGMAFASTM OPD Sigma-Aldrich, catalog no. P9187) for 1 h. The absorbance
of a 200 μL aliquot of this solution was then measured at 450
nm using a spectrophotometer [PerkinElmer (Ensight) multimode plate
reader HH34000000].
The hydrophobicity
and hydrophilicity of the nanofiber surface were confirmed with a
contact angle using a goniometer. Each scaffold ( n = 3) was considered for the study, and using a water droplet, the
angle between the water droplet and surface was used to study the
surface energy of the scaffolds at room temperature 23–25 °C.
The mechanical
characteristics of unmodified and modified PCL nanofibrous scaffolds
in both random and aligned configurations were evaluated using a Shimadzu
universal texture analyzer (EZ-SX) device, manufactured by Shimadzu
Corporation, Japan. Electrospun mats were trimmed to produce samples
measuring approximately 100 mm in length and 20 mm in width. These
samples were securely clamped at both ends and subjected to a constant
stretching rate of 10 mm/min until they reached the point of fracture.
The collected data was subsequently transformed into stress–strain
curves, and tensile strength as well as the percentage of elongation
at break were determined based on the sample’s width and thickness.
The results are presented as the mean value ± the standard deviation
based on three separate measurements.
Nanofiber scaffolds, cut into 1 cm 2 pieces, were immersed
in PBS (pH = 7.4) and incubated in vitro at 37 °C for 7, 14,
and 21 days. At these intervals, water uptake and degradation were
assessed. Water uptake was determined by measuring the wet weight
of the scaffolds after blotting excess surface water. Subsequently,
the scaffolds were washed, dried for 24 h at room temperature, and
weighed to assess degradation. Additionally, morphological changes
were observed using SEM analysis. 23
Human uterine
fibroblast cells (HUF) (PCS-460-010) were maintained using fibroblast
basal medium (ATCC-PCS-201-030) supplemented with the Fibroblast Growth
Kit-low Serum—(ATCC PCS-201-0410) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin.
The cultures were incubated at 37 °C in 5% carbon dioxide. Subsequently,
confluent HUF was seeded onto scaffolds for further investigation.
The scaffolds were cut
to fit the size of a 96 well plate and then sterilized under UV in
the laminar hood for 24 h before cell seeding. HUF were seeded onto
the scaffolds at a density of 5000 cells per well. Scaffolds were
cut into 5 mm diameters each and placed in the 96 well plate, and
tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) was kept as a control. The plate
was then placed in a CO 2 incubator at 37 °C. Readings
were taken at three-time intervals: 1, 7, and 14 days after culturing.
The plate was incubated for 3–4 h with an MTT reagent (0.5
mg/mL). Afterward, 100 μL of DMSO reagent was added to each
well and left for 1 h to dissolve the formazan crystals, resulting
in a color change. Finally, the absorbance of the formazan solution
was measured at 570 nm using a spectrophotometer [PerkinElmer (Ensight)
multimode plate reader HH34000000].
Cell viability of
the seeded cells on the scaffolds was evaluated at two different time
points, day 1 and day 3, using a live/dead assay kit (L3224). To prepare
the live/dead reagent, a stock solution was created by combining 4
μL of EthD-1 and 1 μL of Calcein-AM in 2 mL of PBS. Subsequently,
100–150 μL of the live/dead reagent was added to the
scaffolds and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. The cells were
then examined by using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse-TE2000-U).
Cells were
fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h at room temperature, after
fixing, additional PBS washes were performed, followed by permeabilization
using 0.5% Triton X-100 for 30 min at room temperature. The cells
were then blocked with 5% BSA for 1 h at room temperature. The cells
were later incubated with the appropriate dilution of primary antibody-Versican
(1:100 dilution, NBP2-22408 Novus Biologicals) overnight at 4 °C.
Washes were performed gently, and secondary antibody Rabbit anti-Mouse
IgG1 fluorescein (NBP1-73636 Novus Biologicals) was added at a final
concentration of a 1:1000 for 1 h at room temperature. It was counterstained
with rhodamine-phalloidin stain (R415, Invitrogen) for 45 min and
washed with PBS. The cells were stained with 1:1000 diluted DAPI solution,
and they were visualized under the fluorescence microscope (NikonTE2000U)
with filters.
Total RNA
is extracted from the HUF cultured on the scaffolds for 7 and 14 days
using the standard Trizol RNA (RNA iso Takara) isolation protocol.
The obtained RNA is later subjected to cDNA synthesis using the kit
(RDRT Sigma-Aldrich ReadyScript cDNA Synthesis Mix) according to the
manufacturer’s instruction. Then, the mRNA expression is carried
out by real-time PCR using the SYBR Green master mix (BioRad iTaq
Universal SYBR Green Supermix). The experimental procedure was conducted
with a total volume of 10 μL, comprising 0.5 μL of each
primer, as listed in Table 1 , 5 μL of SYBR green master mix, 3.5 μL of diethylpyrocarbonate-treated
water, and 0.5 μL of cDNA template. Subsequently, the samples
were subjected to 100 cycles using the Qiagen Rotar Q series machine,
and the obtained results were analyzed using the accompanying software,
Rotorgene Qiagen software for the instrument.
Wistar rats ( Rattus norvegicus ) were used for in vivo experiments.
All animals were provided with care in strict adherence to the guidelines
established by the Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, MAHE, for Animal
Care. Furthermore, the Institute’s Ethical Review Committee
granted approval for the experimental protocols under reference number
IAEC/KMC/76/2022. For each group, 3 rats were assigned randomly. Each
animal weighed between 250 and 300 g. Intraperitoneal injections of
ketamine and xylazine were administered to anesthetize animals based
on their weight. The dorsal area of the animals was shaved and sterilized
with 70% ethanol. Using a sterile surgical blade, an incision of about
1 cm was made on the dorsal lobes of animals. A subcutaneous pouch
was created on the incision. Scaffolds were UV sterilized before using
for implantation, and an implant was inserted into each pocket. Upon
implantation of the polymer into the pouch, the cut was sutured. The
sutures were removed 7 days after surgery. After 3 weeks, the tissue
surrounding the implant was excised to study and understand the inflammatory
response by using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and Masson’s
trichome staining.
Haematoxylin stain’s
acidic part, stains mainly the nucleus, while eosin acts as an acidic
stain and binds the basic part, i.e., the cytoplasm. The samples were
fixed with methanol for 30 min, and after drying in air, different
ranges of alcohols such as 100, 70, and 40% are added for a few seconds
each for hydration. The samples were further stained in hematoxylin
for 20 min and washed with 1% acetic acid for 10 min until the nuclei
appeared blue; eosin was added for 30 s, washed with distilled water,
and further treated with a different range of alcohol for dehydration.
Tissue samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C for
24 h and then paraffin embedded. After fixation, slides were stained
with Weigert’s iron hematoxylin for 10–15 min, which
stained the nuclei blue–black, and rinsed in distilled water.
Slides were immersed in Biebrich scarlet acid fuchsin for 5–10
min, which stained the muscle fibers and cytoplasm red, and then rinsed.
Tissue sections were differentiated with phosphomolybdic–phosphotungstic
acid for a few minutes, which removes excess stain from collagen,
and rinsed. Slides were finally immersed in aniline blue for 5–10
min, which stained collagen fibers blue green. Stained sections were
dehydrated in alcohol (70, 95, and 100% ethanol), cleared in xylene,
and mounted using Permount. After drying, Masson’s trichrome-stained
tissue sections were ready for microscopic examination, aiding collagen,
nuclei, and muscle fiber visualization for tissue analysis. Subsequently,
the image intensities were calculated by using ImageJ software.
The data were
collected with replication schemes, and mean values were calculated
for each set. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism
software with ANOVA. Significance levels were represented as follows:
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; and **** p < 0.0001.
Introduction
The mammalian uterus is
a complex female reproductive organ that
plays a vital role in the various stages of reproduction. It is composed
of three distinct layers: the innermost layer, known as the endometrium;
the middle layer, referred to as the myometrium; and the outermost
layer, called the perimetrium. 1 This study
focuses on the myometrium, a specialized layer primarily composed
of smooth muscle cells within the uterus. The myometrium plays a crucial
role in maintaining pregnancy and initiating childbirth. The myometrium
undergoes a complex and dynamic physiological process known as uterine
contractility, which is observed in both nonpregnant and pregnant
women phases across the menstrual cycle and is placed in the group
of spontaneously active and readily excitable muscle tissue. 2 Hormones such as estradiol, oxytocin, and prostaglandins
exert a substantial influence on myometrial function, contributing
to its growth, contraction, and effective functioning. 3
Various complex and intricate interplays of molecules
and interactions
take place within the uterus. Among these biomolecules, carbohydrates
hold particular importance, serving crucial functions throughout different
stages of reproduction. The mammalian uterus consists of a high concentration
of glycoconjugates, primarily engaging implanted embryos, fetuses,
and protecting them from potential pathogens that may enter the uterine
environment. 4 Studies have confirmed that
the surface of the uterus expresses various sugar epitopes that are
detected by lectin proteins. These epitopes are regulated during various
stages of pregnancy, including preimplantation and postimplantation.
It has been established that uterine and trophoblast cells express
both sugar-binding proteins and cell surface glycoconjugates. For
successful implantation to occur, the uterine lining must be receptive.
Carbohydrate recognition has been observed to play a crucial role
in controlling the implantation of the human embryo during the initial
stages. 5 , 6 In another study, it was shown that trophoblasts
have galactose present in them, which is recognized by them human
uterus for invasion and implantation. 7
The uterus, while possessing remarkable regenerative abilities,
is susceptible to various diseases and conditions. Notable among these
are fibroids, also known as leiomyomas, which are noncancerous growths
that develop within the uterine wall, potentially causing discomfort
and complications. 8 Another condition is
adenomyosis, where endometrial glands migrate into the myometrial
region of the uterus, resulting in an enlarged uterus. 9 Furthermore, certain medical procedures, like cesarean
deliveries and uterine surgeries, although often necessary, can impact
the uterus. These interventions may lead to complications in the form
of scarring. These scars have the potential to disrupt the normal
structure of the myometrium, which can give rise to issues such as
abnormal placenta placement and uterine rupture. 10
Traditional approaches such as allografts and transplants,
while
effective in some cases, are not without their significant drawbacks,
including the risk of rejection, infections, and complex postsurgical
complications. In light of these challenges, it is important to consider
alternative approaches. One such approach involves tissue engineering
using principles to create new scaffolds tailored to specific tissues
is essential, which has been explored in this study to design a patch
to treat the region of scar or wound in the myometrium. This includes
designing scaffolds for the uterus, which is a promising way to tackle
important medical issues related to the uterus, pregnancy, and childbirth. 11 In tissue engineering, biomaterials play an
important role by providing a framework similar to the extracellular
matrix (ECM) structure. 12 In order to mimic
the ECM fibrous structure of tissues, the electrospinning technique
is used to create nanofibrous scaffolds. 13 Various polymers have been used for electrospinning nanofibers,
including both natural and synthetic polymers. However, it is more
convenient to process synthetic polymers through electrospinning,
which aids in better control of the nanofiber morphology compared
to natural polymers. Natural polymers are primarily water-soluble,
which poses challenges in directly converting them to nanofibers due
to their inherent instability. Additionally, they are susceptible
to harsh processing conditions because of their mechanical weakness.
In contrast, synthetic polymers offer greater versatility for specific
biological functions while exhibiting desirable properties such as
a cost-effective and easily scalable approach to scaffold development,
ensuring excellent mechanical strength and surface integrity. 14 , 15
Polycaprolactone (PCL), an aliphatic polyester, was utilized
as
a biomaterial in this study. It has a melting point of 55 °C
and remarkable load-bearing mechanical characteristics. It is ideal
for soft tissue engineering, especially for myometrium. 16 Further, we have compared two different types
of nanofibers: randomly oriented and aligned nanofibers. A recent
study by Miki et al. examined the orientation of decellularized uterine
scaffolds (DUS) in rats revealed that scaffold orientation significantly
influences uterine tissue regeneration. Incorrectly oriented DUS led
to aberrant tissue topology. 17 Building
on this insight, we conducted a comparative analysis of random and
aligned nanofibers for uterine tissue regeneration, considering the
myometrium’s complex layers, which are oriented longitudinal,
crisscross, and circular. 18
PCL is
preferred for regeneration, but it has a hydrophobic nature.
To address the issue of the hydrophobic nature of PCL, in this study,
PCL fibers are modified using chemical methods in order to establish
improved cell-scaffold contact and integration. We have used amine
groups to conjugate galactose on the surface of PCL nanofibers. This
design is based on a comprehensive understanding of the role of carbohydrates,
particularly galactose. In this study, the novelty lies in the development
of galactose-conjugated PCL nanofibrous scaffolds tailored to enhance
myometrial regeneration, concurrently establishing a biomimetic environment
and simultaneously creating a biomimetic environment. The rationale
behind the conjugation of galactose is that by modifying polymeric
scaffolds with carbohydrate molecules like galactose, we aim to replicate
the natural interactions that occur within the uterine wall and blastocyst.
The addition of galactose causes the l -selectin-based interaction
of uterine cells with fibers. The ECM is remodeled as a result of
uterine fibroblast activation brought on by l -selectin–galactose
interaction. 19 This modification enhances
the scaffold’s ability to encourage cell attachment, growth,
and tissue repair. The initial step of aminolysis involves the addition
of amino groups to PCL fibers by breaking ester bonds present on the
PCL, 20 and the second step is the addition
of galactose, where galactose is added using lactose, where anomeric
carbon of the glucose will covalently attach to the surface and galactose
is exposed on the surface. 21 The goal of
this surface modification is to improve the hydrophilicity of the
surface of the polymer without altering its mechanical strength. The
addition of galactose is used to increase the hydrophilicity of PCL
which further improves cell adhesion on fibers. This patch presents
a remedy for the efficient regeneration and recovery of uterine myometrium
wounds, with the potential to transform the approach to managing such
injuries related to uterine tissue.