Medical treatment of uterine arteriovenous malformation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
review
OA: bronze
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary
This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized findings on medical treatments for uterine arteriovenous malformations to evaluate their efficacy.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
ObjectiveTo quantify the efficacy of medical management of uterine arteriovenous malformation (AVM) and compare efficacy between different classes of medication. In addition, we evaluated for factors associated with treatment success and pregnancy outcomes after medical management.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.SettingNot applicable.Patient(s)Thirty-two studies representing 121 premenopausal women with medically-treated uterine AVM were identified via database searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and cited references.Intervention(s)Medical treatment with progestins, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a), methotrexate, combined hormonal contraception , uterotonics, danazol, or combination of the above.Main outcome measure(s)Primary outcome of treatment success was defined as AVM resolution without subsequent procedural interventions. Secondary outcome was treatment complication (readmission or transfusion).Result(s)The overall success rate of medical management was 88% (106/121). After adjusting for clustering effects, success rates for progestin (82.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 70.1%-90.4%), GnRH-a (89.3%; 99% CI, 71.4%-96.5%) and methotrexate (90.0%; 99% CI, 55.8%-98.8%) were significantly different from the null hypothesis of 50% success. The agents with the lowest adjusted proportion of complications were progestins (10.0%; 99% CI, 3.3%-26.8%) and GnRH-a (10.7%; 99% CI, 3.5%-28.4%). No clinical factors were found to predict treatment success. Twenty-six subsequent pregnancies are described, with no reported recurrences of AVM.Conclusion(s)Medical management for uterine AVM is a reasonable approach in a well selected patient. These data should be interpreted in the context of significant publication bias.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (3)
- Successful medical treatment with danazol after failed embolization of uterine arteriovenous malformation 2003
- Successful Medical Treatment With Danazol After Failed Embolization of Uterine Arteriovenous Malformation 2003
- A case of severe uterine arteriovenous malformation treated with danazol followed by a transarterial embolization of unilateral uterine and ovarian arteries 2015
Cited by (1)
References (55)
- A case of severe uterine arteriovenous malformation treated with danazol followed by a transarterial embolization of unilateral uterine and ovarian arteries via openalex
- Successful medical treatment with danazol after failed embolization of uterine arteriovenous malformation via openalex
- Successful Medical Treatment With Danazol After Failed Embolization of Uterine Arteriovenous Malformation via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.097 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/13645706.2015.1074082 via openalex
- doi:10.2174/157340481102151218122925 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00404-011-2067-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1590/s0100-39842014000200016 via openalex
- doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.801216.x via openalex
- doi:10.1177/000331977903000111 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181f7381f via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0029-7844(96)00122-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/ccr3.233 via openalex
- W1624568 via openalex
- W42161348 via openalex
- W75231603 via openalex
- W173753643 via openalex
- W273785815 via openalex
- W1776266717 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gco.0b013e328338c179 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/jog.12370 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s11604-019-00907-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.1999.tb03424.x via openalex
- W2800308667 via openalex
- doi:10.1055/s-0035-1563721 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2012.12.008 via openalex
- W2949611941 via openalex
- W2991792334 via openalex
- W6600074345 via openalex
- W6601763851 via openalex
- W6603083369 via openalex
- W6607145568 via openalex
- W6609957646 via openalex
- W6638120712 via openalex
- W6646012392 via openalex
- W6733421571 via openalex
- W6751703084 via openalex
- W6764216215 via openalex
- doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2014.06.008 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000191584.28717.2c via openalex
- doi:10.1136/ijgc-2019-esgo.804 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/jog.13939 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/bcr-2013-009489 via openalex
- doi:10.1155/2017/6437670 via openalex
- doi:10.7863/jum.2006.25.11.1387 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2018.02.065 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s10397-009-0503-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110853 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/875647930201800105 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.rvi.0000096761.74047.7d via openalex
- doi:10.5603/gp.a2018.0039 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.ogx.0000183684.67656.ba via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2018.07.018 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T05:41:49.878000+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK