Reply to: Continuous or cyclic contraceptives for endometriosis: a question still without an answer
This reply to a previous comment discusses the ongoing debate regarding the effectiveness of continuous versus cyclic oral contraceptives for endometriosis management.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This paper is a short reply to a prior comment about the evidence comparing continuous versus cyclic contraceptive regimens for endometriosis. It frames the discussion in relation to earlier publications and systematic-review findings, referencing studies that have compared continuous and cyclic oral contraceptives in endometriosis-associated symptoms and outcomes. The authors do not present new original data in this reply, and the limitation is that it primarily addresses debate and interpretation rather than generating additional trial results. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it directly responds to the comment “Continuous or cyclic contraceptives for endometriosis,” focusing on the ongoing uncertainty in comparing continuous versus cyclic contraceptive approaches for endometriosis.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
1,956 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (6)
- Continuous use of an oral contraceptive for endometriosis-associated recurrent dysmenorrhea that does not respond to a cyclic pill regimen via openalex
- Continuous versus cyclic oral contraceptives for the treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review via openalex
- Continuous versus cyclic use of oral contraceptives after surgery for symptomatic endometriosis: a prospective cohort study via openalex
- Long-term cyclic and continuous oral contraceptive therapy and endometrioma recurrence: a randomized controlled trial via openalex
- Long-term oral contraceptive pills and postoperative pain management after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma: a randomized controlled trial via openalex
- W658969986 via openalex
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-16T06:07:01.518242+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:17:52.213533+00:00