A Review of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women—Reply

In: JAMA · 2021 · vol. 326(21) , pp. 2207 · doi:10.1001/jama.2021.17989 · PMID:34874421 · W4200428521
review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

The authors respond to a critique by stating their comprehensive review of chronic pelvic pain in women included thousands of articles and existing guidelines.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

In Reply We respectfully disagree with Ms Mardon and colleagues that our Review1 on CPP in women was not extensive. We reviewed thousands of articles and the guidelines available in print at the time of our publication.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

Cited by (1)

References (6)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK