Comparison of the transfer of equal numbers of blastocysts versus cleavage-stage embryos after repeated failure of in vitro fertilization cycles.

OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of blastocyst transfer in women with at least two previously unsuccessful in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) attempts.MethodsRetrospective analysis of 238 couples (with previous implantation failures) had equal number (two) of cleavage-stage embryos (n = 143) or blastocysts (n = 95) transferred in the same IVF center.ResultsThe clinical pregnancy rates and live-birth rates were similar in the cleavage-stage embryo transfer group and the blastocyst group (35.6% vs. 40% and 32.1% vs. 35.7%; p > 0.05, respectively). Miscarriage rates (9.8% vs. 10.5%) and multiple pregnancy rates (15.6% vs. 23.6%) did not differ. Although implantation rate was higher with blastocyst transfer than that with day 3 transfer, it did not reach to a statistical significance (24.7% and 19%, respectively, p > 0.05).ConclusionBlastocyst transfer in ICSI cycles does not yield a better outcome than that obtained with cleavage-stage embryos in women who had unsuccessful IVF attempts previously.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-13T06:13:37.491660+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00