Reply
This paper addresses comments on a study about preoperative ultrasound for endometriosis surgery complexity, highlighting the need for standardized terminology and consensus classifications like the IDEA group's.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (2-hop)
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]
References (6)
- Preoperative work-up for patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis: transvaginal ultrasonography must definitely be the first-line imaging examination via openalex
- Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group via openalex
- Ultrasonographic staging: a new staging system for deep endometriosis via openalex
- Ultrasound mapping of pelvic endometriosis: does the location and number of lesions affect the diagnostic accuracy? A multicentre diagnostic accuracy study via openalex
- Ultrasound mapping system for the surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis via openalex
- Uterine sliding sign: a simple sonographic predictor for presence of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:19:26.535059+00:00