Reply
letter
OA: bronze
CC0
Abstract
We thank Drs Exacoustos, Lazzeri and Zupi for their comments on our study and apologize for not citing their publication1. We agree that preoperative sonographic mapping should be mandatory in cases of suspected deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). The aim of their study was to assess the accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) in defining the size and location of DIE with laparoscopic/histological confirmation. This is different from the primary aim of our study, which was to develop and assess the performance of a preoperative ultrasound-based endometriosis-staging system (UBESS) to predict the level of complexity of laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Studies published to date, including that of Exacoustos et al., have looked specifically at the performance of TVS to predict different locations of DIE1-4. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to utilize specifically preoperative ultrasound to predict the subsequent likelihood of a straightforward or difficult laparoscopic surgery. In the grander scheme, however, this is not the point. The most pressing issue in the field of ‘endometriosis ultrasound’ is the lack of clear terminology and the absence of a consensus classification for the lesions5. The consensus opinion published recently by the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group6 addresses these concerns. In the absence of a robust prospective multicenter study which incorporates the terms and definitions described by the IDEA group, different units around the world will continue to publish data on small cohorts which will not change current practice. Collaborations between luminary units from different continents will go a long way to not only reaffirm the benefit of preoperative ultrasound but also have an impact on changing clinical practice and, in turn, potentially improve surgical outcome. S. Reid†, B. Gerges‡ and G. Condous*‡§ †Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia; ‡Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School Nepean University of Sydney, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW, Australia; §OMNI Gynaecological Care Centre for Women's Ultrasound and Early Pregnancy, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia *Correspondence. (e-mail: [email protected])
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (6)
- Preoperative work-up for patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis: transvaginal ultrasonography must definitely be the first-line imaging examination via openalex
- Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group via openalex
- Ultrasonographic staging: a new staging system for deep endometriosis via openalex
- Ultrasound mapping of pelvic endometriosis: does the location and number of lesions affect the diagnostic accuracy? a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study via openalex
- Ultrasound mapping system for the surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis via openalex
- Uterine sliding sign: a simple sonographic predictor for presence of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK