Variable clinical and gynecologic characteristics associated with anatomical site of ectopic pregnancy.

OA: gold CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06 · read from full text

This study used a large, deidentified US claims database (Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample) to examine how clinical and gynecologic characteristics vary by anatomical site of ectopic pregnancy, using retrospective analysis of ambulatory surgery data. The main finding described in the paper is that different ectopic locations are associated with different patterns of patient and clinical/gynecologic features, highlighting variability across sites. A key limitation is the reliance on administrative data, with cautions from the database provider that it has not verified statistical validity or the conclusions derived from the analyses. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 1,395 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 5 sections · click to expand

Author

CRediT author contributions: Conceptualization: K.M.; Data curation: R.S.M.; Formal analysis: K.M.; Funding acquisition: K.M.; Investigation: all authors; Methodology: K.M.; Project administration: K.M.; Resources: J.G.O.; Software: K.M., R.S.M.; Supervision: J.G.O.; Validation: K.M.; Visualization: K.M.; Writing ‐ original draft: A.M.G., K.M.; Writing ‐ review & editing: all authors.

Funding

Ensign Endowment for Gynecologic Cancer Research (K.M.). The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Transparency

The manuscript's corresponding author (K.M.) affirms that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained. The Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample was a part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality is the source of the deidentified data used; and the program has not verified and is not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the study team.

Coi Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Material

Data S1.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-07T06:07:59.301721+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0