Mechanical preparation of the endometrium prior to endometrial ablation.

R.J. Gimpelson, Jodi Kaigh
In: The Journal of reproductive medicine · 1992 · vol. 37(8) , pp. 691–4 · PMID:1432984 · W2418839267
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 7 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

This study found that mechanical preparation of the endometrium yielded results comparable to medical preparation for endometrial ablation, offering a simpler, more compliant, and less side-effect-prone alternative.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Of 143 women who underwent endometrial ablation between May 1986 and August 1991, 16 also had repeat procedures. Medical preparation of the endometrial lining (danazol, leuprolide acetate, or nafarelin acetate) was used in 109 patients; mechanical preparation in the form of suction curettage, in 28 patients; and no preparation, in 6 postmenopausal patients. Evaluation of the results following endometrial ablation showed that the results in mechanically prepared patients were comparable to those in patients receiving traditional medical preparation; thus mechanical preparation can make the procedure simpler, enhance patient compliance, and reduce side effects considerably.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

Cited by (7)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T04:28:40.628799+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK