LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF PHARMACOLOGICAL VERSUS SURGICAL TREATMENT IN WOMEN WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS: IMPACT ON RECURRENCE AND QUALITY OF LIFE — A REVIEW ARTICLE

In: International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science · 2026 · vol. 2(2(50)) · doi:10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5080 · W7164491426
article OA: gold CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-07

Surgical treatment offers short-term endometriosis relief with high recurrence, while pharmacological options provide analgesia with discontinuation recurrence, and combined approaches with long-term hormonal suppression show the most durable results.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14 · read from full text

This open-access systematic review compared long-term outcomes of pharmacological (COCs, progestins, GnRH analogues/antagonists, including add-back strategies) versus surgical (primarily laparoscopic excision) treatment for women with endometriosis, focusing on recurrence, duration of pain control, and quality of life using open-access studies (2006–2026) with at least 12 months follow-up across 35 eligible papers. The review found that surgery is linked to short-term symptom relief with a reported 5-year recurrence rate of 20–50%, whereas drug therapies provide analgesia but show high recurrence after discontinuation. It further reported that combining postoperative hormonal treatment with surgery is associated with markedly decreased recurrence incidence, and that quality of life improves with both approaches, with more sustained benefits associated with recurrence prevention and improved QoL in each modality. The key limitation explicitly acknowledged is that there is no absolute cure with either modality alone, and outcomes are framed as comparative long-term evidence that remains controversial. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it reviews long-term comparative outcomes of pharmacological versus surgical treatment on recurrence and quality of life.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory estrogen-dependent disease affecting approximately 10% of women of reproductive age. Although there have been significant advancements in diagnosis and management, the recurrence and sustained impaired quality of life (QoL) constitute a serious challenge for clinical care. Treatments aim at pharmacological inhibition and surgical excision, but long-term comparative outcomes are controversial. Objectives: To assess long-term outcomes of pharmacological versus surgical treatment in endometriosis treatment in women, including recurrence, duration of pain control, quality of life. Methods: A systematic review of open-access peer-reviewed studies published from 2006 to 2026 was performed, using PubMed Central, BMC, PLOS and other open-access databases. The inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and large cohort studies with ≥12 month follow-up. The included studies included were made up of thirty-five eligible studies. Results: Surgical treatment is associated with short-term symptom relief and a 5-year recurrence rate of 20–50%. Drug interventions (COCs, progestins, GnRH analogues/antagonists) provide analgesia but have a high recurrence rate on discontinuation. The incidence of the recurrence is markedly decreased as a result of combined postoperative hormonal treatment. QoL is improved in both modalities; sustained benefit associated with recurrence prevention and improved QoL is evident in each modality. Conclusions: There is no absolute cure for either modality alone. There is an indication for personalized interventions with treatment and individualized approach, surgical and long-term hormonal suppression leading to the most durable results in patients.
Full text 10,772 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 6 sections · click to expand

Background

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory estrogen-dependent disease affecting approximately 10% of women of reproductive age. Although there have been significant advancements in diagnosis and management, the recurrence and sustained impaired quality of life (QoL) constitute a serious challenge for clinical care. Treatments aim at pharmacological inhibition and surgical excision, but long-term comparative outcomes are controversial.

Objectives

To assess long-term outcomes of pharmacological versus surgical treatment in endometriosis treatment in women, including recurrence, duration of pain control, quality of life.

Methods

A systematic review of open-access peer-reviewed studies published from 2006 to 2026 was performed, using PubMed Central, BMC, PLOS and other open-access databases. The inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and large cohort studies with ≥12 month follow-up. The included studies included were made up of thirty-five eligible studies.

Results

Surgical treatment is associated with short-term symptom relief and a 5-year recurrence rate of 20–50%. Drug interventions (COCs, progestins, GnRH analogues/antagonists) provide analgesia but have a high recurrence rate on discontinuation. The incidence of the recurrence is markedly decreased as a result of combined postoperative hormonal treatment. QoL is improved in both modalities; sustained benefit associated with recurrence prevention and improved QoL is evident in each modality.

Conclusions

There is no absolute cure for either modality alone. There is an indication for personalized interventions with treatment and individualized approach, surgical and long-term hormonal suppression leading to the most durable results in patients.

References

Alonso, A., Gunther, K., Maheux-Lacroix, S., & Abbott, J. (2024). Medical management of endometriosis. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 36(5), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000983 Arcoverde, F. V. L., Andres, M. P., Borrelli, G. M., Barbosa, P. A., Simões Abrão, M., & Kho, R. M. (2019). Surgery for endometriosis improves major domains of quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 26(2), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.774 As-Sanie, S., Harris, R. E., Harte, S. E., Tu, F. F., Neshewat, G., & Clauw, D. J. (2013). Increased pressure pain sensitivity in women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 122(5), 1047–1055. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a7e1f5 Bedaiwy, M. A., Allaire, C., & Alfaraj, S. (2017). Long-term medical management of endometriosis with dienogest and with a GnRH agonist and add-back therapy. Fertility and Sterility, 107(3), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.024 Brown, J., Crawford, T. J., Allen, C., & Hopewell, S. (2017). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain in women with endometriosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(1), Article CD004753. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004753.pub4 Brown, J., Pan, A., & Hart, R. J. (2010). Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues for pain associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2010(12), Article CD008475. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008475.pub2 Bulun, S. E., Yilmaz, B. D., Sison, C., Miyazaki, K., Bernardi, L., Liu, S., Kohlmeier, A., Yin, P., Milad, M., & Wei, J. (2019). Endometriosis. Endocrine Reviews, 40(4), 1048–1079. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2018-00242 Cooper, K. G., Bhattacharya, S., Daniels, J. P., Cheed, V., Gennard, L., Leighton, L., Pirie, D., et al. (2024). Preventing recurrence of endometriosis-related pain by means of long-acting progestogen therapy: The PRE-EMPT RCT. Science Quarterly, 28(55), 1–77. https://doi.org/10.3310/SQWY6998 De Graaff, A. A., D’Hooghe, T. M., Dunselman, G. A. J., Dirksen, C. D., Hummelshoj, L., & Simoens, S. (2013). The significant effect of endometriosis on physical, mental and social wellbeing. Human Reproduction, 28(10), 2677–2685. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det284 Duffy, J. M. N., Arambage, K., Correa, F. J. S., Olive, D., Farquhar, C., Garry, R., & Barlow, D. H. (2020). Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2020(4), Article CD011031. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011031.pub3 Ferrari, S. M., Dolci, C., Tandoi, I., Schimberni, M., Bartiromo, L., Salmeri, N., D’Alessandro, S., Carnemolla, G., Grisafi, G., & Candiani, M. (2025). Long-term postoperative recurrence rates and fertility outcomes after endometrioma CO₂-laser vaporization: A five-year follow-up experience. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 32(2), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2024.09.367 Holdsworth-Carson, S. J., Chung, J., Machalek, D. A., Li, R., Jun, B. K., Griffiths, M. J., Churchill, M., et al. (2024). Predicting disease recurrence in patients with endometriosis: An observational study. BMC Medicine, 22, Article 320. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03508-7 Kwok, H., Li, J., Li, X., Jiang, H., Li, T., & Chen, S. (2025). Risk factors for postoperative recurrence of deep infiltrating endometriosis during a 6- to 12-year follow-up. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 37544. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21821-w Lee, S. R., Yi, K. W., Song, J. Y., Seo, S. K., Lee, D.-Y., Cho, S., Kim, S. H., et al. (2018). Efficacy and safety of long-term use of dienogest in women with ovarian endometrioma. Reproductive Sciences, 25(3), 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719117725820 McDonnell, R., Gollow, J., Nathan, E., Doherty, D., Majumder, K., Wilkinson, E., McElhinney, B., Karthigasu, K., & Hart, R. (2025). Endometriosis quality of life cohort study: Long-term impact of radical laparoscopic excision of endometriosis. Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy, 14(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.4103/gmit.gmit_156_23 Muzii, L., Di Tucci, C., Galati, G., Carbone, F., Palaia, I., Bogani, G., … Tomao, F. (2023). The efficacy of dienogest in reducing disease and pain recurrence after endometriosis surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reproductive Sciences, 30(11), 3135–3143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-023-01266-0 Osuga, Y., Seki, Y., Tanimoto, M., Kusumoto, T., Kudou, K., & Terakawa, N. (2021). Relugolix, an oral GnRH receptor antagonist, in women with endometriosis-associated pain: Phase 2 safety and efficacy 24-week results. BMC Women’s Health, 21, Article 393. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01393-3 Othman, E. R., Al-Hendy, A., Mostafa, R., Lambalk, C. B., & Mijatovic, V. (2024). Oral GnRH antagonists in combination with estradiol and norethindrone acetate for pain relief associated with endometriosis: A review of evidence of a novel class of hormonal agents. International Journal of Women’s Health, 16, 309–321. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S442357 Roman, H., Huet, E., Bridoux, V., Khalil, H., Hennetier, C., Bubenheim, M., … Tuech, J.-J. (2022). Long-term outcomes following surgical management of rectal endometriosis: Seven-year follow-up of patients enrolled in a randomized trial. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 29(6), 767–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2022.02.007 Römer, T. (2018). Long-term treatment of endometriosis with dienogest: Retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety in clinical practice. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 298(4), 747–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4864-8 Sallam, H. N., Garcia-Velasco, J. A., Dias, S., & Arici, A. (2006). Long-term pituitary down-regulation before in vitro fertilization (IVF) for women with endometriosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2006(1), Article CD004635. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004635.pub2 Schindler, A. E. (2011). Dienogest in long-term treatment of endometriosis. International Journal of Women’s Health, 3, 175–184. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S5633 Seo, J.-W., Lee, D.-Y., Kim, S. E., Yoon, B. K., & Choi, D. (2019). Comparison of long-term use of combined oral contraceptive after gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist plus add-back therapy versus dienogest to prevent recurrence of ovarian endometrioma after surgery. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 236, 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.02.032 Seracchioli, R., Mabrouk, M., Manuzzi, L., Vicenzi, C., Frascà, C., Elmakky, A., & Venturoli, S. (2009). Post-operative use of oral contraceptive pills for prevention of anatomical relapse or symptom-recurrence after conservative surgery for endometriosis. Human Reproduction, 24(11), 2729–2735. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep259 Taylor, H. S., Giudice, L. C., Lessey, B. A., et al. (2017). Treatment of endometriosis-associated pain with elagolix. New England Journal of Medicine, 377, 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1700089 Wenzl, A., Wenzl, R., Gstoettner, M., Kuessel, L., Husslein, H., Heine, J., Sandrieser, L., Bekos, C., & Perricos-Hess, A. (2024). Long-term follow-up of the quality of life of endometriosis patients after surgery: A comparative study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(18), Article 5641. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185641 Wu, H., Liu, J.-J., Ye, S.-T., Liu, J., & Li, N. (2024). Efficacy and safety of dienogest in the treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 308, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.03.032 Zakhari, A., Delpero, E., McKeown, S., Tomlinson, G., Bougie, O., & Murji, A. (2020). Endometriosis recurrence following post-operative hormonal suppression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update, 27(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmaa033 Downloads Published Issue Section License Copyright (c) 2026 Urszula Marzec, Agnieszka Giza, Eliza Rajca, Aleksandra Cyrkler, Natalia Cieślak, Paulina Giza, Agata Chodkowska, Kamila Czyżak, Karol Dąbek, Karolina Wymoczył This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles. CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (28)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-08-10T06:04:38.217482+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK