Corifollitropin- α compared to daily r-FSH in for patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Clinical trial study.
This clinical trial found no significant differences in stimulation duration, oocyte yield, or pregnancy outcomes between women receiving corifollitropin alfa versus daily recombinant FSH during intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This randomized clinical trial compared the efficacy of a single injection of long-acting corifollitropin alfa against daily recombinant FSH (Gonal-f) in 109 women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The study found no significant differences between the two groups regarding stimulation duration, follicle count, oocyte yield, embryo quality, or clinical pregnancy rates. While the authors note that previous literature lacks consensus on optimal dosing and patient selection criteria, their results indicate that the long-acting formulation is equally effective to the daily regimen for this population. Relevance to endometriosis: patients with stage III or IV endometriosis were explicitly excluded from the study cohort, meaning the findings do not apply to those with moderate to severe disease.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
17,181 characters
· extracted from
pmc-nxml
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Section
Coi Statement
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-13T09:25:22.628771+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00