VGG11-based deep learning for automated MRI classification of adenomyosis: a systematic comparison of five classification criteria

In: BMC Medical Imaging · 2026 · doi:10.1186/s12880-026-02633-4 · W7204192286
article OA: gold CC0
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-27

A VGG11-based deep learning model achieved over 90% accuracy in automated adenomyosis MRI classification, with the Bazot system demonstrating optimal performance compared to four other criteria.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-27 · read from full text

This study developed a VGG11-based deep learning model to automate the classification of adenomyosis using T2-weighted MRI scans from 6,768 patients. The researchers evaluated five distinct classification criteria—Hulka, Kishi, Bazot, Kobayashi, and Gong—by having expert radiologists label the images and comparing the algorithm's performance across these systems. Results indicated that the model achieved over 90% accuracy for all criteria, with the Bazot 3-class system demonstrating superior performance compared to more complex schemes like the Gong 6-class system, which suffered from data imbalance issues. This paper is centrally about adenomyosis — specifically, the application of deep learning algorithms to standardize and improve the automated diagnostic classification of adenomyosis lesions via magnetic resonance imaging.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been increasingly applied in the classification of adenomyosis; however, due to the lack of a standardized gold standard for lesion classification, it remains challenging to make an early diagnosis and initiate timely treatment. This study aimed to develop a deep learning (DL)-based classification system for adenomyosis and systematically compare the performance of five most frequently researched classification criteria. Using standardized protocols (slice thickness: 3–4 mm, TR/TE: 3000–5000/80–100 ms), T2-weighted images (T2WI) from 6,768 MRI scans acquired at 1.5T and 3T scanners (Siemens, GE, and Philips) were analyzed. Images were independently labeled by three expert radiologists with at least 10 years of experience according to five classification systems (Hulka, Kishi, Bazot, Kobayashi, and Gong), with interobserver agreement (κ = 0.82–0.91). The VGG11 model was evaluated in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The model achieved over 90% accuracy on all criteria. The Bazot 3-class system showed the best performance (accuracy: 0.9778 [95% CI: 0.972–0.983], F1-score: 0.9723). K-fold cross-validation showed stable convergence within 200 epochs. Confusion matrix analysis revealed an exceptional generalization capability, even for the extreme class imbalances (at the sample ratio of 86:1). The Gong 6-class system achieved lower performance (accuracy: 0.9214 [95% CI: 0.912–0.931]) due to data imbalance. Our DL system provided accurate, automated adenomyosis classification. The systematic comparison revealed significant performance differences among various criteria, and the Bazot system was optimal for DL applications, which endowed clinicians with the enhanced diagnostic capabilities for adenomyosis evaluation through MRI. The VGG11-based deep learning model achieved exceptional diagnostic accuracy (over 90% on all criteria), establishing a new benchmark for the MRI-based detection of adenomyosis. This study provided the first comprehensive evaluation of the five most frequently researched adenomyosis classification systems using deep learning, revealing significant performance differences that inform the selection of the optimal clinical protocol. The demonstrated accuracy and consistency of our automated system addressed critical standardization gaps in adenomyosis diagnosis, providing an objective tool for clinicians to reduce diagnostic variability and improve treatment planning.
Full text 6,479 characters · extracted from oa-html · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been increasingly applied in the classification of adenomyosis; however, due to the lack of a standardized gold standard for lesion classification, it remains challenging to make an early diagnosis and initiate timely treatment. This study aimed to develop a deep learning (DL)-based classification system for adenomyosis and systematically compare the performance of five most frequently researched classification criteria.

Methods

Using standardized protocols (slice thickness: 3–4 mm, TR/TE: 3000–5000/80–100 ms), T2-weighted images (T2WI) from 6,768 MRI scans acquired at 1.5T and 3T scanners (Siemens, GE, and Philips) were analyzed. Images were independently labeled by three expert radiologists with at least 10 years of experience according to five classification systems (Hulka, Kishi, Bazot, Kobayashi, and Gong), with interobserver agreement (κ = 0.82–0.91). The VGG11 model was evaluated in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

The model achieved over 90% accuracy on all criteria. The Bazot 3-class system showed the best performance (accuracy: 0.9778 [95% CI: 0.972–0.983], F1-score: 0.9723). K-fold cross-validation showed stable convergence within 200 epochs. Confusion matrix analysis revealed an exceptional generalization capability, even for the extreme class imbalances (at the sample ratio of 86:1). The Gong 6-class system achieved lower performance (accuracy: 0.9214 [95% CI: 0.912–0.931]) due to data imbalance.

Conclusions

Our DL system provided accurate, automated adenomyosis classification. The systematic comparison revealed significant performance differences among various criteria, and the Bazot system was optimal for DL applications, which endowed clinicians with the enhanced diagnostic capabilities for adenomyosis evaluation through MRI. Research highlights The VGG11-based deep learning model achieved exceptional diagnostic accuracy (over 90% on all criteria), establishing a new benchmark for the MRI-based detection of adenomyosis. This study provided the first comprehensive evaluation of the five most frequently researched adenomyosis classification systems using deep learning, revealing significant performance differences that inform the selection of the optimal clinical protocol. The demonstrated accuracy and consistency of our automated system addressed critical standardization gaps in adenomyosis diagnosis, providing an objective tool for clinicians to reduce diagnostic variability and improve treatment planning. Abbreviations - DL: - Deep Learning - MRI: - Magnetic resonance imaging - T2WI: - T2-weighted images - TVUS: - Transvaginal ultrasound - CNN: - Convolutional neural network - JZ: - Junctional zone Funding This work was supported by National Key R&D Plan for Intergovernmental Cooperation, the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No.2022YFE0133100), Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering (Grant No. 2024KFKT016), Sichuan Provincial Natural Science Foundation Project (26NSFSC0004), Nanchong Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology Project (25YYJCYJ0077), Sichuan Medical Science & Technology Innovation Research Association (Grant No. 2026YCYM002), the Sichuan Medical and Health Care Promotion Institute Scientific Research Project (Grant No. KY2025QN0053) and the Project of North Sichuan Medical College Youth Program (Grant No. CBY23-QNA19, CBY23-ZDA12, CBY23-QNA11). Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Ethics declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate We ensured that the work described has been carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki). This retrospective cohort study received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of the Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital, North Sichuan Medical College (Approval No. 2021/104), with waiver of informed consent owing to the anonymized nature of the data. Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process During the preparation of this work, the authors used DeepSeek-V3 (DeepSeek AI) to improve the language fluency and readability of the manuscript. All AI-generated content was carefully reviewed, edited, and approved by the authors, who assume full responsibility for the final published work. The authors carefully reviewed and edited all content generated by this tool and assume full responsibility for the final published work. Consent for publication Not applicable. Disclosure The author declares no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could influence the content reported in this study. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Additional information Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Supplementary Information Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Rights and permissions Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. About this article Cite this article Tang, Y., Tian, Hd., Chen, Xm. et al. VGG11-based deep learning for automated MRI classification of adenomyosis: a systematic comparison of five classification criteria. BMC Med Imaging (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02633-4 Received: Accepted: Published: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02633-4

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-09-02T06:56:13.785363+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK