Comparison of clinical targeted next-generation sequence data from formalin-fixed and fresh-frozen tissue specimens

Other OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-02 ⓘ

Researchers compared next-generation sequencing data from paired fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded lung adenocarcinoma specimens, finding high concordance despite minor differences in library metrics to support the reliability of routine FFPE samples for clinical testing.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has emerged as a powerful technique for the detection of genetic variants in the clinical laboratory. NGS can be performed using DNA from FFPE tissue, but it is unknown whether such specimens are truly equivalent to unfixed tissue for NGS applications. To address this question, we performed hybridization-capture enrichment and multiplexed Illumina NGS for 27 cancer-related genes using DNA from 16 paired fresh-frozen and routine FFPE lung adenocarcinoma specimens and conducted extensive comparisons between the sequence data from each sample type. This analysis revealed small but detectable differences between FFPE and frozen samples. Compared with frozen samples, NGS data from FFPE samples had smaller library insert sizes, greater coverage variability, and an increase in C to T transitions that was most pronounced at CpG dinucleotides, suggesting interplay between DNA methylation and formalin-induced changes; however, the error rate, library complexity, enrichment performance, and coverage statistics were not significantly different. Comparison of base calls between paired samples demonstrated concordances of >99.99%, with 96.8% agreement in the single-nucleotide variants detected and >98% accuracy of NGS data when compared with genotypes from an orthogonal single-nucleotide polymorphism array platform. This study demonstrates that routine processing of FFPE samples has a detectable but negligible effect on NGS data and that these samples can be a reliable substrate for clinical NGS testing.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing Specimen Handling Humans Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide Reproducibility of Results Specimen Handling

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-11-01T09:25:17.647243+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:12:08.185882+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-11-05T06:08:55.941966+00:00