Human cleavage-stage embryo vitrification is comparable to slow-rate cryopreservation in cycles of assisted reproduction

RCT OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-01 ⓘ

This study compared slow-rate cryopreservation and vitrification of human cleavage-stage embryos, finding that clinical pregnancy and implantation rates were highly comparable between the two methods.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare embryo survival, pregnancy and implantation rates after cryopreservation of human cleavage-stage embryos with slow-rate cryopreservation or vitrification. STUDY DESIGN: 262 patients, attending for assisted reproduction, were prepared for oocyte retrieval using standard controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols. Excess embryos were cryopreserved on day 3 either by vitrification, or slow-rate cryopreservation in a programmable freezer. Cycles of thawing were monitored for thaw efficiency, pregnancy and implantation rates. RESULTS: Clinical pregnancy and implantation rates were highly comparable between cycles in which day 3 embryos were thawed either after slow-rate cryopreservation or vitrification. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that vitrification of human embryos during assisted reproduction cycles achieves comparable success rates to fresh cycles and therefore can be applied in the laboratory of assisted reproduction.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Cleavage Stage, Ovum Cryopreservation Embryo Implantation Vitrification Cryopreservation Embryo Transfer Female Humans Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Pregnancy Rate Prospective Studies Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-18T09:30:06.152893+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:07:47.794683+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-19T06:34:38.229974+00:00