Nationwide survey (Japan) on spontaneous hemoperitoneum in pregnancy
other
OA: green
public-domain-us
Abstract
AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current state and clinical characteristics of spontaneous hemoperitoneum in pregnancy (SHiP) in Japan by performing a comprehensive survey.
METHODS: We reviewed data on pregnant women who developed SHiP during 2013-2017 (for 5 years), and were admitted to any of the perinatal centers in Japan. The survey assessed maternal background and maternal and neonatal prognosis. We divided the cases into two groups, favorable and poor prognosis groups, and made comparisons between the two groups.
RESULTS: Of the 407 facilities in Japan, 267 (66%) facilities responded to our survey. Overall, 31 cases of SHiP were registered. Maternal death occurred in one case (3%) due to liver bleeding with an unknown cause. Of 23 cases with a SHiP onset during pregnancy, 12 (53%) had been misdiagnosed as placental abruption. The prognosis for the fetuses included miscarriage or stillbirth in three cases (10%) and asphyxia in 12 cases (42%). There was no significant correlation between the amount of intra-abdominal blood loss and neonatal prognosis based on umbilical artery pH. Incidences of preterm birth <32 gestational weeks (adjusted odds ratio, 35.75; 95% confidence interval, 3.46-368.82) were higher in the poor prognosis group than that in the favorable group. Endometriosis and artificial reproductive techniques were both associated with 19% of all cases of SHiP.
CONCLUSION: SHiP was associated with maternal death and poor fetal prognosis. Prematurity and persistent uterine contractions which might be misdiagnosed as placental abruption seem to contribute to poor fetal prognosis.
Full text
1,768 characters
· extracted from
oa-pdf
· click to expand
wÊ_¶Ìv|
êdåw
Odåwåw@ãwn¤È
®Ib ¶½ãÈwêUÕ°ãwnuÀl¼ ÀÆü
YÈwlÈwªì
å_¶Ìè¼
Nationwide survey (Japan) on spontaneous hemoperitoneum in pregnancy
å_¶Ìv|
{¤ÍAú{ɨ¯éSpontaneousHemoperitoneum in Pregnancy (SHiP)ÌÀÔð¾ç©
ɵAÕ°IÁ«ð¾ç©É·é±ÆÅ éB
fÃ^ðp¢½ãëü«Ï@¤Å éBEnæüYúêqãÃZ^[(407{ÝjðÎ
ÛÉA2013~2017N(5NÔjÌúÔÅSHiPðǵ½áÉ¢ÄAP[g²¸ðÀ{µ
½B²¸ÚÍAêÌwiAêÌ\ãAV¶\ãƵAWßçê½áðV¶\ãÇDQÆ\
ãsÇQÌ2Qɪ¯ärE¢µ½B{¤ÍOdåwãw®a@Ìãwn¤ÏR¸Ï
õï̳Fð¾Ä¢éi³FÔFH2019-151)B
407{Ý267{Ý(66%j©çñð¾ÄA31Çáªo^³ê½B6á(19%)ª¶Bâ
ãÃÅÌDPÅ Á½BܽA6á(19%jªq{àÇðLµA»Ì¤¿4á(13%jª¶Bâ
ãÃÅÌDPÅ Á½BêÌ\ãÉÖµÄÍA´ös¾ÌÌoÉæèDYwSð1á(3%)
FßA»Ì¼ÌÇáͶ¶µêÌãÇÇàFßçêÈ©Á½BDPÇÌ23á12á(53%)
ªAÙ@\sSâq{ÌpûkðFßĨèApOÉíÊÙÕú£Æff³êÄ¢½BV¶
\ãÉÖµÄÍA¬YEYÍ3á(10%)AV¶¼Í12á(42%jÅ Á½BV¶\
ãÇDQA\ãsÇQɨ¯éärÌÊA\ãsÇöqÍ32T¢ÌYi²®IbYä6.5,
96%Cl:l.05E40.13)ApOÌíÊÙÕú£Ìffi²®IbYä35.75,96%Cl:3.46E368.82)
Å Á½BܽAo¬ÆV¶\ãi£Ñ®¬pH)ÌÔÉÍALÓÈÖÖWÍFßÈ©Á½B
ú{ɨ¯éSHiPÉ¢ÄßÄ̲¸ðÀ{µ½BêÌSðFßApxɬYEYE
V¶¼ðFßé\ãsÇȾ³Å Á½BܽAñ20ɶBâãÃAq{àÇðwi
öqƵÄLµÄ¢½Bq{àÇÈOÌaöÈÇܾ¾ç©É³êĢȢ±Æà½A¡ãÌ
ÛèÅ éB
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Ask this paper
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-15T06:15:18.721777+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:24:37.768885+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine