Optimizing Outcomes: Perioperative Strategies for Patients With Chronic Pelvic Pain

In: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology · 2026 · doi:10.1097/grf.0000000000001042 · PMID:42474257 · W7169782157
article OA: closed CC0
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-20

This paper addresses perioperative management challenges for chronic pelvic pain, emphasizing comprehensive preoperative screening of risk factors like central sensitization and comorbidities to optimize surgical recovery outcomes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-20 · read from full text

This paper examines the perioperative management challenges faced by patients with chronic pelvic pain, noting that such individuals often experience heightened anxiety and severe postoperative pain flares. The authors argue that comprehensive preoperative screening is essential to evaluate risk factors like central sensitization, substance use, and concurrent chronic overlapping pain conditions. By identifying these specific risk profiles, clinicians can better manage patient expectations and provide targeted strategies to optimize surgical recovery outcomes. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically, it addresses the broader category of chronic pelvic pain in which endometriosis is a primary etiology, focusing on optimizing perioperative care for this patient population.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) severely impacts quality of life, presenting distinct perioperative management challenges. Patients face heightened anxiety, severe postoperative pain, prolonged recovery from fear of movement, and persistent pain amplified by concurrent chronic overlapping pain conditions (COPCs). While data on preoperative pain's precise impact remains limited, surgery often triggers severe flares. Consequently, comprehensive preoperative screening is crucial. Evaluating risk factors-including central sensitization, substance use, smoking, COPCs, specific pain generators, and psychological comorbidities-allows clinicians to manage expectations effectively. Ultimately, this targeted risk assessment equips patients with the necessary strategies and tools to optimize their surgical recovery.
Full text 987 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Optimizing Outcomes: Perioperative Strategies for Patients With Chronic Pelvic Pain - Adeoti E. Oshinowo* - Rukset Attar† - Rebecca Thompson* - Innie Chen‡ - Michael S. Kinson§ Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) severely impacts quality of life, presenting distinct perioperative management challenges. Patients face heightened anxiety, severe postoperative pain, prolonged recovery from fear of movement, and persistent pain amplified by concurrent chronic overlapping pain conditions (COPCs). While data on preoperative pain’s precise impact remains limited, surgery often triggers severe flares. Consequently, comprehensive preoperative screening is crucial. Evaluating risk factors—including central sensitization, substance use, smoking, COPCs, specific pain generators, and psychological comorbidities—allows clinicians to manage expectations effectively. Ultimately, this targeted risk assessment equips patients with the necessary strategies and tools to optimize their surgical recovery.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (36)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-08-28T06:02:16.119096+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-28T06:28:33.284919+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK