The current applications of cell-free fetal DNA in prenatal diagnosis of single-gene diseases: A review.

OA: gold CC-BY-NC-4.0
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-04

This review compares noninvasive prenatal diagnosis approaches for single-gene disorders, including relative mutation dosage and relative haplotype dosage assays, based on cell-free fetal DNA analysis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-04 · read from full text

This review examines the current applications of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in the non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of single-gene diseases, contrasting these methods with traditional invasive techniques like chorionic villus sampling. The authors detail various molecular strategies, including relative mutation dosage and targeted locus amplification, to detect specific genetic mutations while acknowledging challenges such as low fetal DNA fractions and X-linked inheritance complexities. Although the primary focus is on genetic disorders, the paper briefly notes that elevated plasma cfDNA levels are also associated with pathogenic cell proliferation conditions such as endometriosis. Relevance to endometriosis: mentioned only tangentially as one example of a condition linked to increased circulating cell-free DNA, while the paper's main focus is prenatal genetic diagnosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Prenatal diagnosis of hereditary diseases has substantially altered the way medical geneticists are helping families affected by genetic disorders. However, the risk of miscarriage and fear of invasive diagnostic procedures may discourage many couples from seeking prenatal diagnosis. With the discovery of maternal plasma cell-free fetal DNA, prenatal diagnosis has entered a new era of progress. Cell-free DNA is released during normal physiological functions as well as through the cell death programs of apoptosis and necrosis. It can be found in the plasma and other body fluids. Although this method has the advantage of being noninvasive, it is still rather expensive and requires advanced hardware and comprehensive data analysis. Promising implications of noninvasive prenatal diagnosis methods for the diagnosis of common trisomy disorders have paved the way for the development of more complicated assays of single-gene disorders. Relative mutation dosage and relative haplotype dosage are the most widely implemented assays for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of single-gene disorders. However, each assay has its own advantages and disadvantages. Relative mutation dosage is based on the droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique which includes quantification features of real-time PCR assays. Relative haplotype dosage is based on next-generation sequencing that includes analysis of the maternal and paternal genome followed by sequencing of maternal plasma cell-free DNA. Co-amplification at a lower denaturation temperature PCR is another approach that is based on forming heteroduplexes between alleles to selectively amplify paternal mutations. In this review, we have described the most common noninvasive prenatal diagnosis approaches and compared their applications in genetic disorder diagnosis with different inheritance patterns.
Full text 19,390 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 2 sections · click to expand

Section

Recent advances in NIPD for the identification of single-gene diseases have provided promising prospects in prenatal diagnosis. We can expect that in the coming decade, a significant number of single-gene disorders will be detected by NIPD methods. However, ethical issues are among the concerns that should be addressed before the widespread implementation of advanced NIPD techniques. Ultimately, population-specific genome databases are highly desired for their high specificity in the detection of mutations within the context of inter-population variation.

Coi Statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-13T09:25:22.628771+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0