The role of Akkermansia muciniphila in the regulation of inflammatory bowel disease: intestinal immunity and metabolism.

OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06 · read from full text

This paper reviews evidence on Akkermansia muciniphila in inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis), focusing on intestinal immunity and metabolism and drawing on findings from patient observations and multiple experimental models. Across studies, the review reports that A. muciniphila abundance is altered in IBD and describes mechanisms by which live, pasteurized, or specific components (e.g., Amuc_1100, AmTARS, and outer membrane vesicles) can signal through receptors such as TLR2/TLR4 and NLR inflammasomes, promoting anti-inflammatory cytokines (notably IL-10), reducing pro-inflammatory mediators, and improving barrier-related mucin and tight-junction markers. A major caveat emphasized is that effects are contentious and context-dependent, varying by strain, host species, inflammatory milieu, antibiotic reconstitution, and genetic susceptibility, with some settings showing pro-inflammatory or colitogenic outcomes. Relevance to endometriosis: the review explicitly names endometriosis as a host factor associated with increased susceptibility to altered or harmful effects of A. muciniphila, though the paper’s main focus is IBD.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is closely associated with the abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila (A. muciniphila), a resident member of the intestinal tract that is being developed as a next-generation probiotic. Accumulated evidence has indicated that the live and pasteurized A. muciniphila, as well as its components and secretions, have exhibited protective and ameliorative functions in IBD. Nevertheless, the precise and intricate regulatory mechanisms of A. muciniphila in IBD remain unclear, which is crucial for investigating the etiology of IBD and searching for innovative, targeted therapeutic strategies. In this review, we discuss the reciprocal influence between A. muciniphila and intestinal immunity in IBD, encompassing the roles of immune cells, intestinal epithelial cells (IECs), and intestinal stem cells (ISCs). Subsequently, we outline the mutual regulatory interactions between A. muciniphila and intestinal metabolism, focusing on tryptophan (Trp) metabolism, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) metabolism, and bile acids (BAs) metabolism. Understanding how A. muciniphila interacts with its host is a vital step for facilitating its application in IBD therapy.
Full text 43,498 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 3 sections · click to expand

The

Although there has been extensive research on the utilization of A. muciniphila in animal models, the assessment of its safety in the clinic is limited ( 121 , 122 ). In 2019, Depommier et al. conducted the initial utilization of A. muciniphila in humans through a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with overweight/obese and insulin-resistant volunteers. Their findings indicated that the daily oral supplementation of 10 10 A . muciniphila bacteria for three months, whether in live or pasteurized form, was both safe, well-received and improved several metabolic parameters ( 123 ). In 2021, the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods, and Food Allergens issued a scientific opinion on the safety of pasteurized A. muciniphila (strain ATCC BAA-835T) as a novel food. The Panel determined that the pasteurized A. muciniphila at a daily intake of 3.4ake 10 cells is safe for the target population as long as the quantity of viable A. muciniphila remains under 10 cells/g in the novel food, which opened doors for its application into food supplements and medical nutrition ( 124 ). An analysis of the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and relevant literature indicates that research on A. muciniphila has predominantly focused on the effects of its live and pasteurized forms on metabolic disorders, including overweight, obesity, and insulin resistance ( 125 – 127 ). A smaller number of clinical studies have explored its impact on muscle strength and respiratory symptoms ( 128 , 129 ). However, the clinical trials assessing the gastrointestinal inflammation are presently restricted to the impact of A. muciniphila on irritable bowel syndrome ( 130 ). There are few experiments to demonstrate its safety in the treatment of IBD. Hence, further clinical research is essential to confirm the potential and safety of A. muciniphila in mitigating intestinal inflammatory diseases.

Intro

The IBD, including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a chronic inflammatory disease driven by inappropriate intestinal immune activation. The etiology of IBD is complex and multifactorial, primarily involving genetic and environmental factors, which perturb the homeostasis between the gut microbiome and the host immune system ( Figure 1 ) ( 1 , 2 ). The burden of IBD across the globe is still considerable ( 3 ). Patients with IBD have an increased risk of colorectal cancer, which is the third most common cancer in the world (9.6% of all cancers globally) ( 4 – 6 ). Conventional IBD treatment methods involve medication therapy, e.g., aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, antibiotics, biological agents, small molecule drugs, and surgical treatment if necessary ( 7 ). Researchers have identified that patients with IBD exhibit altered bacterial diversity and abundance compared to healthy individuals. In addition, the Gram-negative bacteria exhibit the main difference in fecal microbiota between UC patients and healthy individuals ( 8 ). The precise mechanisms of host-microbiota crosstalk in IBD remain incompletely elucidated. To address this, multi-omics approaches are being leveraged to systematically decode these complex cross-talk networks ( 9 – 13 ). Consequently, modulating the gut microbiota has emerged as a promising strategy for restoring homeostasis and advancing novel therapeutic interventions for IBD ( 8 , 14 , 15 ). The factors involved in the pathogenesis of IBD. A. muciniphila is a species of the genus Akkermansia , which belongs to the family Akkermansiaceae in the phylum Verrucomicrobiota . It was initially isolated from healthy female feces in 2004 and cultivated in a specific medium containing mucin as the sole carbon and nitrogen source ( 16 , 17 ). A. muciniphila is a Gram-negative commensal bacterium that is dominantly distributed in the intestinal mucus layer and fecal samples of both human and animals. Its relative abundance is approximately 1-4% (10 6– 10 8 CFU/g) of total bacteria in feces of healthy adults ( 18 , 19 ). A. muciniphila in the intestinal tract is known as a mucolytic specialist, primarily degrading mucins ( 20 , 21 ). This process not only leads to the renewal of mucins but also results in the release of oligosaccharides and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which all play an important role in microbial community and host health ( 16 , 22 – 27 ). Several studies have demonstrated that the abundance of A. muciniphila is significantly altered in both IBD patients and model mice compared with healthy controls ( 28 – 30 ). Recent studies have demonstrated that the gut microbiota composition in UC patients during long-term remission closely resembles that of healthy individuals. Notably, the abundance of A. muciniphila increases significantly during the remission phase compared to the active phase of CD ( 31 , 32 ). The live and pasteurized A. muciniphila , as well as its components, e.g., outer membrane proteins, extracellular vesicles, have been evidenced to be relevant to IBD, which predominantly influence the immune responses, gut microbiota, metabolism, and the integrity of the intestinal barrier ( 30 , 33 – 37 ). However, the role of A. muciniphila in IBD remains contentious, as it may exert pro-inflammatory effects under specific conditions. These include bacterial strain differences; host species disparities (e.g., human, mouse); the presence of pathogen-induced inflammation (such as Salmonella Typhimurium infection); reconstitution of the gut microbiota following antibiotic treatment; and increased susceptibility in certain hosts. Such susceptible individuals may include those with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), endometriosis, disrupted gastrointestinal motility, as well as people carrying genetic defects (e.g., IL-10 or HNF4A deficiency) ( 38 – 42 ). Although A. muciniphila has shown promise in the intervention of IBD, its specific mechanisms of action remain complex and unexplained. In this review, we outline the interaction of A. muciniphila in IBD with intestinal immunity and gut metabolism. These interactions are crucial for modulating intestinal immune responses, the integrity of the intestinal barrier, the homeostasis of intestinal microbiota, and metabolism.

Conclusions

The pathways of A. muciniphila in mitigating IBD are mainly represented by the regulation of the immune response, gut microbiota homeostasis, and intestinal barrier integrity. The majority of these pathways involve the participation of intestinal cells and microbial metabolism. In the future, more research efforts should be devoted to explore the mechanisms of various components or different forms of A. muciniphila in regulating intestinal cells and metabolism by integrating multi-omics data. In addition, it is equally crucial to investigate how intestinal cells and metabolic factors influence the colonization and abundance of A. muciniphila . This will contribute to a more in-depth and detailed theoretical foundation for the therapeutic application of A. muciniphila in the treatment of IBD. The role of A. muciniphila in intestinal inflammation is occasionally controversial. A. muciniphila generally exerts protective effects in healthy individuals or those with metabolic disorders (e.g., obesity and type 2 diabetes), but it may become pathogenic under specific conditions, such as a disrupted barrier, coexistence with pathogenic bacteria, and susceptible hosts. Furthermore, interspecies differences (e.g., between humans and mice) and strain-specific variations of A. muciniphila itself collectively determine whether it alleviates or exacerbates IBD. It seems that the effectiveness of A. muciniphila in alleviating intestinal inflammation varies among individuals. Currently, both live and pasteurized A. muciniphila , along with their components and secreted products, have demonstrated potential in alleviating IBD, yet these findings are still at the animal level. The A. muciniphila has potential as a next-generation probiotic for disease therapy, but significant safety issues must be resolved before developing clinically available products for IBD treatment.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-07T06:07:59.301721+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0