Gamete intrafallopian transfer vs superovulation with intrauterine insemination for the treatment of infertility

other OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-28

This retrospective analysis found gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) had significantly higher pregnancy rates than superovulation with intrauterine insemination (SO-IUI) for infertility treatment.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Superovulation with intrauterine insemination (SO-IUI) has been suggested as an alternative to gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT), despite the absence of controlled or comparative trials. We retrospectively analyzed all GIFT and SO-IUI cycles performed concurrently from January 1985 to August of 1987 at a single university center. Pregnancy rates were significantly better for GIFT than SO-IUI (P less than 0.001), with an odds ratio of 3.25 (P = 0.001). Stepwise multiple logistic regression identified factors that correlate with pregnancy: absence of endometriosis (P = 0.05), infertility less than 3 years' duration (P = 0.002), TMS greater than or equal to 30 X 10(6) (P = 0.005), and treatment with GIFT rather than SO-IUI (P = 0.001). These data give a first approximation of the increased efficacy of GIFT versus SO-IUI and provide valuable insight into significant confounding variables to be considered when planning a randomized, prospective trial to evaluate these techniques.
Full text 5,433 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Superovulation with intrauterine insemination (SO-IUI) has been suggested as an alternative to gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT), despite the absence of controlled or comparative trials. We retrospectively analyzed all GIFT and SO-IUI cycles performed concurrently from January 1985 to August of 1987 at a single university center. Pregnancy rates were significantly better for GIFT than SO-IUI (P<0.001), with an odds ratio of 3.25 (P=0.001). Stepwise multiple logistic regression identifield factors that correlate with pregnancy: absence of endometriosis (P=0.05), infertility<3 years' duration (P=0.002), TMS ≧30×106 (P=0.005), and treatment with GIFT rather than SO-IUI (P=0.001). These data give a first approximation of the increased efficacy of GIFT versus SO-IUI and provide valuable insight into significant confounding variables to be considered when planning a randomized, prospective trial to evaluate these techniques. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Asch RH, Ellsworth LR, Balmaceda JP: Pregnancy following translaparoscopic gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT). Lancet 1984;2:1034–1035 Matson PL, Blackledge DG, Richardson PA, Turner SR, Yovich JM, Yovich JL: The role of gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) in the treatment of oligospermic infertility. Fertil Steril 1987;48:608–612 Yovich JL, Matson PL: Pregnancy rates after high intrauterine insemination of husband's spermatozoa or gamete intrafallopian transfer Lancet 1986;2(8518):1287 Dodson WC, Whitesides DB, Hughes CL Jr, Easley HA III, Haney AF: Superovulation with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility: a possible alternative to gamete intrafallopian transfer and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1987;48:441–445 Serhal PF, Katz M, Little V, Woronowski H: Unexplained infertility—The value of Pergonal superovulation combined with intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1988;49:602–606 Melis GB, Paoletti AM, Strigini F, Fabris FM, Canale D, Fioretti P: Pharmacologic induction of multiple follicular development improves the success rate of artificial insemination with husband's semen in couples with male-related or unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 1987;47:441–445 Kemmann E, Bohrer M, Shelden R, Fiasconaro G, Beardsley L: Active ovulation management increases the monthly probability of pregnancy occurrence in ovulatory women who receive intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1987;48:916–920 Lalich RA, Marut EL, Prins GS, Scommegna A: Life table analysis of intrauterine insemination pregnancy rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:980–984 Allen NC, Herbert III CM, Maxson WS, Rogers BJ, Diamond MP, Wentz AC: Intrauterine insemination: a critical review: Fertil Steril 1985;44:569–580 Cruz RI, Kemmann E, Brandeis VT, Becker KA, Beck M, Beardsley L, Shelden R: A prospective study of intrauterine insemination of processed sperm from males with oligoasthenospermia in superovulated women. Fertil Steril 1986;46:673–677 Hoing LM, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC: Treatment of infertility because of oligoasthenosteratospermia by transcervical intrauterine insemination of motile spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 1986;45:388–391 Margalloth EJ, Sauter E, Bronson RA, Rosenfeld DL, Scholl GM, Cooper GW: Intruterine insemination as treatment for antisperm antibodies in the female. Fertil Steril 1988;50:441–446 Vargyas JM, Morente C, Shangold G, Marrs RP: The effect of different methods of ovarian stimulation for humanin vitro fertilization and embryo replacement. Fertil Steril 1984;42:745–749 Asch RH, Balmaceda JP, Ellsworth LR, Wong PC: Gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT): A new treatment for infertility. Int J Fertil 1985;30:41–45 Molloy D, Speirs A, de Plessis Y, McBain J, Johnston I: A laparoscopic approach to a program of gamete intrafallopian transfer. Fertil Steril 1987;47(2):289–294 Asch RH, Balmaceda JP, Ellsworth LR, Wong PC: Preliminary experiences with gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT). Fertil Steril 1986;45:366–371 Olive DL, Lee KL: Analysis of sequential treatment protocols for endometriosis-associated infertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;154(3):613–619 Mantel N, Byar DP: Evaluation of response time data involving transient state: An illustration using heart-transplant data. J Am Stat Assoc 1974;69:81–86 Trounson A, Mohr L: Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-call embryo. Nature 1983;305:707–709 Nemiro JS, Mcgaughey RW: An alternative to in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: The successful transfer of human oocytes and spermatazoa to the distal oviduct. Fertil Steril 1986;46:644–652 Yovich JL, Yovich JM, Edirisinghe WR: The relative chance of pregnancy following tubal or uterine transfer procedures. Fertil Steril 1988;49:858–864 Hewitt J, Cohen J, Krishnaswamy V, Fehilty CB, Steptoe PC, Walters DE: Treatment of idiopathic infertility, cervical mucus hostility, and male infertility: Artificial insemination with husband's semen orin vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril 1985;44:350–355 Author information Authors and Affiliations Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Kaplan, C.R., Olive, D.L., Sabella, V. et al. Gamete intrafallopian transfer vs superovulation with intrauterine insemination for the treatment of infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet 6, 298–304 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01139186 Received: Accepted: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01139186

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

MeSH descriptors

Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer Infertility Insemination, Artificial Insemination, Artificial Ovulation Superovulation Adult Female Humans Infertility Pregnancy Regression Analysis Retrospective Studies

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-24T06:08:07.662257+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:09:10.744835+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-24T06:27:14.670421+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine