Pregnancy prediction models and eSET criteria for IVF patients--do we need more information?
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
Analysis of 1675 treatment cycles identified embryo quality, patient age, and basal FSH as significant pregnancy predictors, revealing that prediction models offer limited advantage over simple allocation criteria for identifying good prognosis patients.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of the present study was to evaluate statistical prediction models and simple allocation criteria, based on predictors for pregnancy, as tools to identify a good prognosis group in a possible eSET setting.MethodsA pregnancy prediction model based on logistic regression models was generated by analysis of 1675 DET treatment cycles. The model was evaluated and compared to simple eSET allocation criteria.ResultsEmbryo quality, patient age, and basal FSH were identified as significant predictors (at 5% significance level) of pregnancy. Although comparable to previously generated models, the predictive ability of the present model was relatively poor and practically similar to simple allocation criteria based on age and embryo quality.ConclusionsExisting prediction models, or simple allocation criteria, are limited in identifying good prognosis patients. Future studies of the applicability of improved pregnancy prediction models will need very comprehensive and detailed patient and embryo information.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-27T09:11:36.575535+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-02T06:31:42.897446+00:00