Laparoscopy in chronic pelvic pain
This study evaluated 79 chronic pelvic pain patients, finding laparoscopy's sensitivity and specificity were 98.46% and 100% respectively, confirming its role as a gold standard in diagnosis.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (2-hop)
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]
References (7)
- Chronic pelvic pain via openalex
- Different methods for evaluation of chronic pelvic pain via openalex
- Laparoscopic findings in women with chronic pelvic pain via openalex
- Laparoscopy in 100 women with chronic pelvic pain via openalex
- [Laparoscopy in chronic pelvic pain--a prospective clinical study] via openalex
- [Laparoscopy in chronic pelvic pain--a retrospective clinical study] via openalex
- The role of laparoscopy in the evaluation of chronic pelvic pain: pitfalls with a negative laparoscopy via openalex
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00