Randomized controlled trial comparing Thermachoice III* in the outpatient versus daycase setting
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed
this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is
available through Endo Lab. The
publisher's page (linked below)
is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional
access, use "Find at my library".
AI-generated summary
This randomized controlled trial compared the Thermachoice III endometrial ablation device in outpatient versus daycase settings to evaluate patient outcomes and procedural efficiency.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (2)
- A randomised trial comparing local <i>versus</i> general anaesthesia for microwave endometrial ablation 2003
- Thermachoice endometrial ablation in the outpatient setting, without local anesthesia or intravenous sedation: A prospective cohort study 2005
Cited by (4)
- Pain relief in office gynaecology: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2011
- Outpatient Thermachoice Endometrial Balloon Ablation: Long-Term, Prognostic and Quality-of-Life Measures 2010
- Menstrual Problems for the MRCOG and Beyond 2014
- A survey of women’s views of Thermachoice endometrial ablation in the outpatient versus day case setting 2007
References (15)
- A randomised trial comparing local <i>versus</i> general anaesthesia for microwave endometrial ablation via openalex
- Thermachoice endometrial ablation in the outpatient setting, without local anesthesia or intravenous sedation: A prospective cohort study via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.1999.tb03463.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0849-5831(16)30493-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00064.x via openalex
- W2119661101 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/oem.2003.012302 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01465-x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00005-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/emj.18.3.205 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/bf00844930 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2508.2002.00543.x via openalex
- doi:10.1006/gyno.1994.1009 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2000.tb11892.x via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001751 via openalex
Cited by (4)
- Menstrual Problems for the MRCOG and Beyond 2014
- Pain relief in office gynaecology: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2011
- Outpatient Thermachoice Endometrial Balloon Ablation: Long-Term, Prognostic and Quality-of-Life Measures 2010
- A survey of women’s views of Thermachoice endometrial ablation in the outpatient versus day case setting 2007
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-14T06:52:15.578221+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK