IVF births and pregnancies: an exploration of two methods of assessment using life-table analysis

Other OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-22 ⓘ

This study compared hazard and fecundability rates using life-table analysis in an Ontario IVF clinic, concluding that while both are valid for prospective patients, fecundability is the more appropriate index for program comparisons.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to explore two methods of expressing the performance of IVF programs. METHODS: Using life-table methods, hazard and cure rates and a "monthly fecundability rate" were calculated for an Ontario IVF clinic. The rates were evaluated for their meaningfulness as indicators of the clinic's performance. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: While the hazard rate describes monthly fertility among those who will eventually become pregnant, the fecundability rate describes fertility for all patients who enter the program, making it the more appropriate index for program comparisons. However, from a prospective patient's perspective, both methods are valid indices for summarizing a program's performance.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Fertilization in Vitro Birth Rate Female Fertilization in Vitro Fertilization in Vitro Humans Male Pregnancy Pregnancy Rate Survival Analysis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T20:59:53.382863+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-14T06:23:58.021457+00:00