Epidemiology

In: Endometriosis · 2020 · pp. 7–8 · doi:10.1201/9780429448980-2 · W4242385906
book-chapter OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10

This paper reviews the epidemiology of endometriosis, highlighting diagnostic challenges and prevalence variations across different subtypes and patient populations.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometriosis remains a disease marred with confusion due to the absence of an easy, noninvasive diagnosis; changing definitions; and the absence of a validated classification system. Endometriosis is one of the most common diagnoses in women with pelvic pain. Prevalence estimates vary from about a 4% occurrence of largely asymptomatic endometriosis found in women undergoing tubal ligation to 50% of teenagers with intractable dysmenorrhea. It is important to clearly distinguish among subtle, typical, cystic, and deep endometriosis and to understand the shifts that have occurred, mainly in the recognition of subtle endometriosis and deep endometriosis. Estimations of subtle endometriosis range from 5% to 50% and from 50% to 80% in asymptomatic or symptomatic women, respectively.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisdysmenorrhea

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

References (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK