Abdominal wall endometriosis: a rarely anticipated diagnosis: a 16-year experience and brief literature review

The Journal of reproductive medicine · 2014 · vol. 59(3-4) , pp. 110–2 · PMID:24724217 · W183402280
Review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 7 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This retrospective review of nine patients found that abdominal wall endometriosis was rarely anticipated preoperatively, with neoplasia being the more common suspected diagnosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cases of endometriosis of the abdominal wall to determine whether the diagnosis was anticipated preoperatively and whether or not the patient had undergone prior surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of records of patients undergoing surgical resection of abdominal wall endometriosis from 1996-2011. RESULTS: Nine cases were identified. For the 8 cases with a recorded preoperative diagnosis, the clinical diagnosis of endometriosis was recorded preoperatively in only 25% of cases. The most common preoperative diagnosis was neoplasia. CONCLUSION: Abdominal wall endometriosis remains a difficult diagnosis to make preoperatively. Awareness among gynecologists and consideration of the diagnosis in the differential will potentially decrease the number of cases suspected of malignancy and may alleviate some stress on the patients' part, due to the possibility of a benign diagnosis.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Abdominal Wall Endometriosis Adult Adult Diagnosis, Differential Diagnosis, Differential Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Female Humans Humans Middle Aged Middle Aged Preoperative Period Preoperative Period

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

Cited by (7)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-15T06:08:49.021275+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:13:34.636433+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK