Persistent urinary retention after deep infiltrating endometriosis surgery: to consider modification in patient selection or modification in surgical approach and extent? - An ethical challenge

In: Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine Disorders · 2024 · vol. 6 , pp. 100069 · doi:10.1016/j.jeud.2024.100069 · W4392382579
article OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-11

This paper discusses the ethical challenge of patient selection and surgical approach modifications needed to mitigate the risk of persistent urinary retention following deep infiltrating endometriosis surgery.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

• Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis (DIE) affects around 20% of women with endometriosis, causing endometriotic lesions that penetrate pelvic structures, leading to symptoms like pelvic pain, digestive issues, and infertility. • Surgery is often required for moderate to severe cases, but it carries the risk of complications, such as persistent urinary retention, which can significantly impact the patient's quality of life. • Balancing the benefits of surgery with the risk of complications is a challenge in achieving optimal outcomes. Surgery for endometriosis aims to remove abnormal tissue and symptoms, but it may damage pelvic nerves, causing urinary retention.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisdie_deep_infiltratinginfertility

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (19)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK