Isthmic uterine lesions: a comprehensive pictorial review of MRI features and management strategies

review OA: closed CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-11

This pictorial essay reviews uterine isthmic lesions, including isthmoceles, fibroids, ectopic pregnancies, and endometriosis, detailing their MRI appearances, clinical correlations, and management options.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 · read from full text

This pictorial review assesses MRI features and management strategies for a range of uterine isthmic lesions, focusing on the uterine isthmus and related diagnostic challenges. It highlights image-rich appearances and clinical/epidemiologic correlations for isthmoceles (cesarean scar defects) and complications, isthmic fibroids, cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies, isthmic endometriosis, adenomyosis/adenomyomas, post-curettage vascular malformations, niche-related IUD malposition, trophoblastic implants, and endometrial polyps, emphasizing lesion characterization by size, location, and malignancy risk; it does not generate new datasets. A key limitation is that, as a comprehensive narrative pictorial essay, it does not report original quantitative outcomes or systematic comparative effectiveness data. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it includes and reviews isthmic endometriosis as one of the lesion categories with MRI features and management considerations.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The uterine isthmus, the narrowest portion of the uterus, plays an essential role in female reproductive health and can be the site of several gynecological pathologies. Due to its strategic location, lesions in this region have unique characteristics and can lead to a wide variety of symptoms and diagnostic challenges. Diagnosis is usually made through imaging tests, such as ultrasound (US) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with appropriate treatment depending on the precise identification of the type of lesion and evaluation of factors such as size, location, and risk of malignancy. This pictorial essay provides a comprehensive, image-rich review of multiple uterine isthmic lesions-including isthmoceles (cesarean scar defects) and their complications, fibroids in the isthmus, cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies (CSEP), isthmic endometriosis, adenomyosis/adenomyomas, post-curettage vascular malformations, niche-related intrauterine device (IUD) malposition, trophoblastic tissue implants, and endometrial polyps-highlighting their MRI appearances, epidemiological and clinical correlations, and management options.
Full text 8,508 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

The uterine isthmus, the narrowest portion of the uterus, plays an essential role in female reproductive health and can be the site of several gynecological pathologies. Due to its strategic location, lesions in this region have unique characteristics and can lead to a wide variety of symptoms and diagnostic challenges. Diagnosis is usually made through imaging tests, such as ultrasound (US) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with appropriate treatment depending on the precise identification of the type of lesion and evaluation of factors such as size, location, and risk of malignancy. This pictorial essay provides a comprehensive, image-rich review of multiple uterine isthmic lesions—including isthmoceles (cesarean scar defects) and their complications, fibroids in the isthmus, cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies (CSEP), isthmic endometriosis, adenomyosis/adenomyomas, post-curettage vascular malformations, niche-related intrauterine device (IUD) malposition, trophoblastic tissue implants, and endometrial polyps—highlighting their MRI appearances, epidemiological and clinical correlations, and management options. Similar content being viewed by others Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

Baldini GM, Lot D, Malvasi A, et al. Isthmocele and Infertility. J Clin Med. Multidisciplinary; 2024;13(8):2192. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082192. Kremer TG, Ghiorzi IB, Dibi RP. Isthmocele: an overview of diagnosis and treatment. Rev Assoc Med Bras; 2019;65(5):714–721. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.65.5.714. Szafarowska M, Biela M, Wichowska J, et al. Symptoms and Quality of Life Changes after Hysteroscopic Treatment in Patients with Symptomatic Isthmocele—Preliminary Results. J Clin Med; 2021;10(13):2928. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132928. Gerkowicz SA, Fiorentino DG, Kovacs AP, Arheart KL, Verma U. Uterine structural abnormality and intrauterine device malposition: analysis of ultrasonographic and demographic variables of 517 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019;220(2):1831–1838. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.122. Verest A, Borwski E, Cadron I, Van Calenbergh S, Vanspauwen R. Intrauterine device (IUD) migration in cesarean delivery scar: What to do with the niche? Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2019;11(3):251–256. PMID: 32082532. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32082532. Boortz HE, Margolis DJA, Ragavendra N, Patel MK, Kadell BM. Migration of Intrauterine Devices: Radiologic Findings and Implications for Patient Care. RadioGraphics. 2012;32(2):335–352. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.322115068. Bar-El L, Chu A, Goldstein K, Seckin S, Seckin T. Isthmocele endometriosis: the relationship between cesarean section and endometriosis. Fertil Steril; 2022;117(6):1334–1336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.02.024. Quesada J, Härmä K, Reid S, et al. Endometriosis: A multimodal imaging review. Eur J Radiol; 2023;158:110610. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110610. Vercellini P, Viganò P, Somigliana E, Fedele L. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol; 2014;10(5):261–275. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2013.255. Edi R, Cheng T. Endometriosis: Evaluation and Treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2022;106(4):397–404. PMID: 36260896. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36260896. Pavone D, Clemenza S, Sorbi F, Fambrini M, Petraglia F. Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Uterine Fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2018;46:3–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.09.004. Stewart E, Cookson C, Gandolfo R, Schulze-Rath R. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review. BJOG. 2017;124(10):1501–1512. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14640. Shivanna BS, Rashmi R, Shivanna L. Rare case of huge isthmic fibroids. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2013;2(16):2657–2660. doi: https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/594. Sefah N, Ndebele S, Prince L, et al. Uterine fibroids — Causes, impact, treatment, and lens to the African perspective. Front Pharmacol; 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1045783. Ascher SM, Wasnik AP, Robbins JB, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Fibroids. J Am Coll Radiol; 2022;19(11):S319–S328. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.019. Tu W, Yano M, Schieda N, et al. Smooth Muscle Tumors of the Uterus at MRI: Focus on Leiomyomas and FIGO Classification. Radiographics; 2023;43(6). doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.220161. Vannuccini S, Petraglia F, Carmona F, Calaf J, Chapron C. The modern management of uterine fibroids-related abnormal uterine bleeding. Fertil Steril; 2024;122(1):20–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.04.041. Kennedy A, Debbink M, Griffith A, Kaiser J, Woodward P. Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: A Do-Not-Miss Diagnosis. RadioGraphics; 2024;44(7). doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.230199. Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancies. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2006;107(6):1373–1381. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000218690.24494.ce. Lin R, DiCenzo N, Rosen T. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: nuances in diagnosis and treatment. Fertil Steril; 2023;120(3):563–572. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.07.018. Miller R, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #63: Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022;227(3):B9–B20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.024. Vandenbroucke L, Morcel K, Bruneau B, et al. Malformations artérioveineuses endo-utérines acquises. Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2011;39(7–8):469–472. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.05.008. Szpera-Goździewicz A, Gruca-Stryjak K, Bręborowicz GH, Ropacka-Lesiak M. Uterine arteriovenous malformation — diagnosis and management. Ginekol Pol; 2018;89(5):276–279. doi: https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2018.0047. Yammine K, Osman D, Daher J, Salha M, Mouawad S. Acquired uterine arteriovenous malformation treated with superselective embolization: Case report. Radiol Case Rep; 2023;18(6):2204–2208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2023.03.018. Vitale SG, Haimovich S, Laganà AS, Alonso L, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Carugno J. Endometrial polyps. An evidence-based diagnosis and management guide. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021. p. 70–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.03.017. Grasel RP, Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Capuzzi D, Parker L, Hussain SM. Endometrial Polyps: MR Imaging Features and Distinction from Endometrial Carcinoma. Radiology. 2000;214(1):47–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.214.1.r00ja3647. Sajjad N, Iqbal H, Khandwala K, Afzal S. Polypoid Adenomyoma of the Uterus. Cureus; 2019; doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4044. Kawaguchi M, Kato H, Suzui N, et al. MR imaging findings differentiating uterine submucosal polypoid adenomyomas from endometrial polyps. Br J Radiol. 2019;92(1095):20180430. doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180430. Wall DJ, Reinhold C, Akin EA, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Female Infertility. J Am Coll Radiol; 2020;17(5):S113–S124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.018. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions M.A.S.T., G.D and E.O.P. designed the manuscript; B.K.A. and B.G.B.T. gathered references, M.A.S.T. and E.B.C prepared the figures, L.R.T., E.A.S.B., G.D., E.O.P. provided imaging cases, M.A.S.T. wrote the main manuscript, E.O.P., U.S.T. and G.D. edited the manuscript and gave supervised guidance. All authors reviewed the manuscript. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests. Additional information Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Araújo Santana Tavares, M., Busoletto Tripode, B., Kozlowski Andreucci, B. et al. Isthmic uterine lesions: a comprehensive pictorial review of MRI features and management strategies. Abdom Radiol 50, 6076–6084 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-05037-0 Received: Revised: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-05037-0

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

MeSH descriptors

Cicatrix Cicatrix Cicatrix Cicatrix Cicatrix Cicatrix Cicatrix Cicatrix Cicatrix Cicatrix Cicatrix Cicatrix Cicatrix Cicatrix Cicatrix Cicatrix Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (4)

References (29)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-16T06:07:01.518242+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-06-16T06:03:41.094201+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-16T06:25:30.133384+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK