{"paper_id":"27aa645a-0c2c-4a9b-8600-7940d504cdc4","body_text":"Abstract\nThe uterine isthmus, the narrowest portion of the uterus, plays an essential role in female reproductive health and can be the site of several gynecological pathologies. Due to its strategic location, lesions in this region have unique characteristics and can lead to a wide variety of symptoms and diagnostic challenges. Diagnosis is usually made through imaging tests, such as ultrasound (US) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with appropriate treatment depending on the precise identification of the type of lesion and evaluation of factors such as size, location, and risk of malignancy. This pictorial essay provides a comprehensive, image-rich review of multiple uterine isthmic lesions—including isthmoceles (cesarean scar defects) and their complications, fibroids in the isthmus, cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies (CSEP), isthmic endometriosis, adenomyosis/adenomyomas, post-curettage vascular malformations, niche-related intrauterine device (IUD) malposition, trophoblastic tissue implants, and endometrial polyps—highlighting their MRI appearances, epidemiological and clinical correlations, and management options.\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nData availability\nNo datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.\nReferences\nBaldini GM, Lot D, Malvasi A, et al. Isthmocele and Infertility. J Clin Med. Multidisciplinary; 2024;13(8):2192. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082192.\nKremer TG, Ghiorzi IB, Dibi RP. Isthmocele: an overview of diagnosis and treatment. Rev Assoc Med Bras; 2019;65(5):714–721. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.65.5.714.\nSzafarowska M, Biela M, Wichowska J, et al. Symptoms and Quality of Life Changes after Hysteroscopic Treatment in Patients with Symptomatic Isthmocele—Preliminary Results. J Clin Med; 2021;10(13):2928. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132928.\nGerkowicz SA, Fiorentino DG, Kovacs AP, Arheart KL, Verma U. Uterine structural abnormality and intrauterine device malposition: analysis of ultrasonographic and demographic variables of 517 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019;220(2):1831–1838. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.122.\nVerest A, Borwski E, Cadron I, Van Calenbergh S, Vanspauwen R. Intrauterine device (IUD) migration in cesarean delivery scar: What to do with the niche? Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2019;11(3):251–256. PMID: 32082532. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32082532.\nBoortz HE, Margolis DJA, Ragavendra N, Patel MK, Kadell BM. Migration of Intrauterine Devices: Radiologic Findings and Implications for Patient Care. RadioGraphics. 2012;32(2):335–352. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.322115068.\nBar-El L, Chu A, Goldstein K, Seckin S, Seckin T. Isthmocele endometriosis: the relationship between cesarean section and endometriosis. Fertil Steril; 2022;117(6):1334–1336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.02.024.\nQuesada J, Härmä K, Reid S, et al. Endometriosis: A multimodal imaging review. Eur J Radiol; 2023;158:110610. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110610.\nVercellini P, Viganò P, Somigliana E, Fedele L. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol; 2014;10(5):261–275. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2013.255.\nEdi R, Cheng T. Endometriosis: Evaluation and Treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2022;106(4):397–404. PMID: 36260896. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36260896.\nPavone D, Clemenza S, Sorbi F, Fambrini M, Petraglia F. Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Uterine Fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2018;46:3–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.09.004.\nStewart E, Cookson C, Gandolfo R, Schulze-Rath R. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review. BJOG. 2017;124(10):1501–1512. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14640.\nShivanna BS, Rashmi R, Shivanna L. Rare case of huge isthmic fibroids. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2013;2(16):2657–2660. doi: https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/594.\nSefah N, Ndebele S, Prince L, et al. Uterine fibroids — Causes, impact, treatment, and lens to the African perspective. Front Pharmacol; 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1045783.\nAscher SM, Wasnik AP, Robbins JB, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Fibroids. J Am Coll Radiol; 2022;19(11):S319–S328. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.019.\nTu W, Yano M, Schieda N, et al. Smooth Muscle Tumors of the Uterus at MRI: Focus on Leiomyomas and FIGO Classification. Radiographics; 2023;43(6). doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.220161.\nVannuccini S, Petraglia F, Carmona F, Calaf J, Chapron C. The modern management of uterine fibroids-related abnormal uterine bleeding. Fertil Steril; 2024;122(1):20–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.04.041.\nKennedy A, Debbink M, Griffith A, Kaiser J, Woodward P. Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: A Do-Not-Miss Diagnosis. RadioGraphics; 2024;44(7). doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.230199.\nRotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancies. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2006;107(6):1373–1381. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000218690.24494.ce.\nLin R, DiCenzo N, Rosen T. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: nuances in diagnosis and treatment. Fertil Steril; 2023;120(3):563–572. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.07.018.\nMiller R, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #63: Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022;227(3):B9–B20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.024.\nVandenbroucke L, Morcel K, Bruneau B, et al. Malformations artérioveineuses endo-utérines acquises. Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2011;39(7–8):469–472. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.05.008.\nSzpera-Goździewicz A, Gruca-Stryjak K, Bręborowicz GH, Ropacka-Lesiak M. Uterine arteriovenous malformation — diagnosis and management. Ginekol Pol; 2018;89(5):276–279. doi: https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2018.0047.\nYammine K, Osman D, Daher J, Salha M, Mouawad S. Acquired uterine arteriovenous malformation treated with superselective embolization: Case report. Radiol Case Rep; 2023;18(6):2204–2208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2023.03.018.\nVitale SG, Haimovich S, Laganà AS, Alonso L, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Carugno J. Endometrial polyps. An evidence-based diagnosis and management guide. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021. p. 70–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.03.017.\nGrasel RP, Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Capuzzi D, Parker L, Hussain SM. Endometrial Polyps: MR Imaging Features and Distinction from Endometrial Carcinoma. Radiology. 2000;214(1):47–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.214.1.r00ja3647.\nSajjad N, Iqbal H, Khandwala K, Afzal S. Polypoid Adenomyoma of the Uterus. Cureus; 2019; doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4044.\nKawaguchi M, Kato H, Suzui N, et al. MR imaging findings differentiating uterine submucosal polypoid adenomyomas from endometrial polyps. Br J Radiol. 2019;92(1095):20180430. doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180430.\nWall DJ, Reinhold C, Akin EA, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Female Infertility. J Am Coll Radiol; 2020;17(5):S113–S124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.018.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nContributions\nM.A.S.T., G.D and E.O.P. designed the manuscript; B.K.A. and B.G.B.T. gathered references, M.A.S.T. and E.B.C prepared the figures, L.R.T., E.A.S.B., G.D., E.O.P. provided imaging cases, M.A.S.T. wrote the main manuscript, E.O.P., U.S.T. and G.D. edited the manuscript and gave supervised guidance. All authors reviewed the manuscript.\nCorresponding author\nEthics declarations\nConflict of interest\nThe authors declare no competing interests.\nAdditional information\nPublisher’s note\nSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.\nRights and permissions\nSpringer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nAraújo Santana Tavares, M., Busoletto Tripode, B., Kozlowski Andreucci, B. et al. Isthmic uterine lesions: a comprehensive pictorial review of MRI features and management strategies. Abdom Radiol 50, 6076–6084 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-05037-0\nReceived:\nRevised:\nAccepted:\nPublished:\nVersion of record:\nIssue date:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-05037-0","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}