Safety of Hemostatic Sutures for Hemostasis of the Ovarian Bed After Endometriotic Ovarian Cystectomy

In: Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology · 2016 · vol. 14(2) · doi:10.1007/s40944-016-0065-1 · W2422493341
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-06-13

This prospective cohort study compared hemostatic sutures and electrocautery for ovarian bed hemostasis after endometriotic ovarian cystectomy, finding comparable hemoglobin/hematocrit levels and treatable complications for both.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This prospective cohort controlled randomized study enrolled 84 women with endometrioma undergoing laparoscopic stripping excision, comparing hemostatic sutures versus electrocautery (bipolar or monopolar) to control ovarian bed bleeding. Outcomes included hemoglobin and hematocrit, duration of surgery, number of sutures, hospital stay, blood transfusion needs, and postoperative complications such as ovarian hematomas, with intraperitoneal drains used routinely in suture cases. Hemoglobin/hematocrit changes were comparable between groups, and hemostatic sutures were reported as effective for achieving hemostasis, with complications documented and treated; however, there were more complications in the suture group and hospital stay was longer, though not statistically significant. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it evaluates the safety of hemostatic sutures used during laparoscopic surgery for endometriotic ovarian cystectomy/endometrioma.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 6,091 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Introduction The use of the hemostatic sutures minimizes the damage related to the use of cautery in the ovarian bed after cystectomy. The main concern for the wide use of this method is the concerns about the safety of the sutures as the hemostasis seems to be incomplete when compared to cauterization. Aim To study the safety of hemostatic sutures for achieving hemostasis of the ovarian bed after ovarian cystectomy of endometrioma. Design Prospective cohort controlled study. Setting Shatby maternity University hospital.

Methods

Eighty-four women with endometrioma were included in the study. Patients were randomized to laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy with use of electrocautery (bipolar or unipolar) or use of sutures for control of bleeding from the ovarian bed. All cases underwent laparoscopy for removal of ovarian endometriomas by stripping. Hemostasis of the bleeding from the ovarian bed was controlled by either electrocautery (bipolar or monopolar) or hemostatic sutures. Effect of the use of both methods was studied including hemoglobin level, hematocrit level, duration of surgery, number of sutures needed, duration of hospital stay, need for blood transfusion and postoperative complications including ovarian hematomas. There was a routine use of intraperitoneal drain in all suture cases.

Results

It was found that using hemostatic suture was effective in controlling the bleeding from the ovarian bed. The hemoglobin and the hematocrit were comparable in both groups. Complications for both techniques were documented and treated.

Conclusion

It could be concluded that hemostatic sutures are safe procedure and tolerable for the patient although more cases with complication in the suture group which was not statistically significant and there was longer hospital stay. This technique has the advantage of minimizing the damage of cystectomy to stripping only by avoiding cauterization of healthy ovarian tissues. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Fedele L, Bianchi S, Zanconato G, Bergamini V, Berlanda N. Bipolar electrocoagulation versus suture of solitary ovary after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometriomas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11:344–7. Somigliana E, Ragni G, Benedetti F, Borroni R, Vegetti W, Crosignani PG. Does laparoscopic excision of endometriotic ovarian cysts significantly affect ovarian reserve? Insights from IVF cycles. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:2450–3. Nargund G, Cheng WC, Parsons J. The impact of ovarian cystectomy on ovarian response to stimulation during in vitro fertilization cycles. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:81–3. Loh FH, Tan AT, Kumar J, Kumar J, Ng SC. Ovarian response after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy for endometriotic cysts in 132 monitored cycles. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:316–21. Ho HY, Lee RK, Hwu YM, Lin MH, Su JT, Tsai YC. Poor response of ovaries with endometrioma previously treated with cystectomy to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002;19:507–11. Candiani M, Barbieri M, Bottani B, Bertulessi C, Vignali M, Agnoli B, et al. Ovarian recovery after laparoscopic enucleation of ovarian cysts: Insights from echographic short-term postsurgical follow-up. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12:409–14. Muzii L, Bianchi A, Croce’ C, Manci N, Benedetti Panici P. Laparoscopic excision of ovarian cysts: is the stripping technique a tissue-sparing procedure? Fertil Steril. 2002;77:609–14. Muzii L, Bellati F, Bianchi A, Palaia I, Manci N, Zullo MA, et al. Laparoscopic stripping of endometriomas: a randomized trial on different surgical techniques. Part II: pathological results. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1987–92. Li C-Z, Liu B, Wen ZQ, Sun Q. The impact of electrocoagulation on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic excision of ovarian cysts: a prospective clinical study of 191 patients. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(4):1428–35. Mais V, Ajossa S, Piras B, Marongiu D, Guerriero S, Melif GB. Treatment of nonendometriotic benign adnexal cyst: a randomized comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:770–4. Luciano AA, Lowney J, Jacobs SL. Endoscopic treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility. Therapeutic, economic and social benefits. J Reprod Med. 1992;37:573–6. Yuen PM, Yu KM, Yip SK, Lau WC, Rogers MS, Chang A. A randomized prospective study of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the management of benign ovarian masses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:109–14. Lundorff P, Hahlin M, Kallfelt B, Thorburn J, Lindblom B. Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:911–5. Hart R, Hickey M, Maouris P, Buckett W. Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometriomata. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;16:004992. Riedel HH, Staner U, Mecke H. Results of electron microscopy studies of the uterine horn of the New Zealand rabbit following use of 4 different coagulation methods. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1987;109:1350–67. Takashima A, Takeshita N, Otaka K, Kinoshita T. Effects of bipolar electrocoagulation versus suture after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma on ovarian reserve and in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(3):S139. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest All authors have nothing to declare. Funding This study was not funded. Ethical Approval All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed Consent Informed consent was obtained from the patient included in the study. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Mahmoud, T.H., El-Agwany, A.S. Safety of Hemostatic Sutures for Hemostasis of the Ovarian Bed After Endometriotic Ovarian Cystectomy. Indian J Gynecol Oncolog 14, 36 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40944-016-0065-1 Received: Accepted: Published: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40944-016-0065-1

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (17)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-04T06:34:25.427880+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK