Comparison of Doppler ultrasound indices of uterine artery and sub endometrial blood supply in frozen embryo transfer with and without repeated implantation failure: A cross-sectional study.

Observational OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-12 · read from full text ⓘ

This cross-sectional study evaluated Doppler ultrasound indices of the uterine artery and sub-endometrial blood supply in 139 women undergoing frozen embryo transfer, comparing those with repeated implantation failure to a control group without such history. The results indicated that while pulsatility index and peak systolic velocity did not differ significantly between groups, the resistance index was significantly higher in women experiencing repeated implantation failure. Additionally, the study found differences in endometrial perfusion areas, suggesting that altered vascular resistance may be associated with reduced endometrial receptivity. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Uterine blood supply has been identified as a potential factor in implantation failure. Objective: This study aimed to investigate Doppler indices in the uterine artery, including vascular flow and resistance, as well as the amount of sub-endometrial blood supply in women with a history of repeated implantation failure (RIF) compared to the non-RIF group. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 139 women candidates for frozen embryo transfer in Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Yazd, Iran from February to July 2023. Group A (n = 68) included women with a history of more than 2 RIF, and group B (n = 71) included women candidates for implantation for the first time without RIF. Doppler ultrasound indices of uterine artery and sub-endometrium, including sub-endometrial flow, uterine artery flow, uterine artery resistance, and peak systolic velocity, were recorded. Results: No significant differences were observed in uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index and peak systolic velocity between groups, but the uterine artery resistance index was significantly higher in the A group (p < 0.001). A significant difference was observed in the perfusion area between groups. 60/68 women in the group A had endometrial perfusion in areas 2 and 3 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our study revealed that women with RIF exhibited higher resistance index in sub-endometrial arteries compared to the non-RIF group.
Full text 12,844 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 2 sections · click to expand

Section

This study revealed that women with RIF exhibited higher RI in sub-endometrial arteries compared to group B. Other studies have also linked implantation failure in IVF cycles with decreased or absent blood flow in the sub-endometrium. When assessing endometrial receptivity, it is crucial to consider multiple factors, including Doppler indices, endometrial thickness, volume, echo, peristalsis, and blood flow.

Coi Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose. We uphold the principles of integrity and transparency in our research and have no personal or financial affiliations that could influence the outcomes or interpretation of our work.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Per Europe PMC