Functional Connectivity Differences Underly Variable Centralized Symptom Relief After Hysterectomy

preprint OA: green CC0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-06 ⓘ

Non-improvers of centralized symptoms after hysterectomy exhibited distinct presurgical brain connectivity patterns characterized by increased ascending pain integration and decreased descending modulation compared to improvers.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-03 · read from full text ⓘ

This observational study investigated whether baseline central nervous system pain processing differences predict the trajectory of centralized symptoms, such as fatigue and multisite pain, following hysterectomy for chronic pelvic pain. Researchers compared improvers and non-improvers based on Fibromyalgia Survey Score changes six months post-surgery, finding that non-improvers exhibited higher sensory sensitivity and distinct functional connectivity patterns during sustained pressure pain. Specifically, non-improvers demonstrated increased connectivity between somatosensory and limbic regions alongside decreased connectivity in descending pain modulation pathways. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Approximately 1 in 4 women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) report persistent pelvic pain after hysterectomy. Centralized symptoms-fatigue, multisite pain, and sleep disturbance, quantified using the Fibromyalgia Survey Score (FSS)-often co-occur with this risk, but the trajectory of centralized symptom burden after surgery, independent of pelvic pain outcome, is not well understood. Whether presurgical differences in central nervous system pain processing distinguish women whose centralized symptoms improve (improvers) from those whose do not (non-improvers) has not been tested. In this observational study, we assessed whether individuals who do and do not report improvement in FSS scores six months post-operatively differ in their baseline/pre-operative phenotypes and brain function. Sensory sensitivity scores were significantly higher in non-improvers than in improvers at baseline. We identified no significant, presurgical differences in age, average pelvic pain intensity, widespread pain, or pain interference between improvers and non-improvers. Functional connectivity was examined at rest and during the application of a distal, sustained pressure pain. We identified no significant group differences at rest. During sustained pressure pain, non-improvers showed greater connectivity than improvers between primary somatosensory cortex and posterior thalamic seeds with frontal, motor, cerebellar and limbic regions, but lower connectivity between the periaqueductal gray and subgenual cingulate cortex. Non-improvers also showed a greater pain-evoked increase in connectivity between the pelvic and leg representations of the primary sensory cortex and other sensorimotor regions in the pain-versus-rest contrast. Overall, non-improvers showed increased functional connectivity between regions associated with the multisensory integration of ascending pain, and decreased connectivity between regions associated with descending pain modulation. In exploratory analyses, some of these connections were additionally associated with symptom burden: sensory sensitivity, number of painful regions, and pain interference. This work may inform mechanisms of persistent symptom burden and guide surgical decision-making in patients with high central sensitization.
Full text 2,365 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Abstract Approximately 1 in 4 women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) report persistent pelvic pain after hysterectomy. Centralized symptoms-fatigue, multisite pain, and sleep disturbance, quantified using the Fibromyalgia Survey Score (FSS)-often co-occur with this risk, but the trajectory of centralized symptom burden after surgery, independent of pelvic pain outcome, is not well understood. Whether presurgical differences in central nervous system pain processing distinguish women whose centralized symptoms improve (improvers) from those whose do not (non-improvers) has not been tested. In this observational study, we assessed whether individuals who do and do not report improvement in FSS scores six months post-operatively differ in their baseline/pre-operative phenotypes and brain function. Sensory sensitivity scores were significantly higher in non-improvers than in improvers at baseline. We identified no significant, presurgical differences in age, average pelvic pain intensity, widespread pain, or pain interference between improvers and non-improvers. Functional connectivity was examined at rest and during the application of a distal, sustained pressure pain. We identified no significant group differences at rest. During sustained pressure pain, non-improvers showed greater connectivity than improvers between primary somatosensory cortex and posterior thalamic seeds with frontal, motor, cerebellar and limbic regions, but lower connectivity between the periaqueductal gray and subgenual cingulate cortex. Non-improvers also showed a greater pain-evoked increase in connectivity between the pelvic and leg representations of the primary sensory cortex and other sensorimotor regions in the pain-versus-rest contrast. Overall, non-improvers showed increased functional connectivity between regions associated with the multisensory integration of ascending pain, and decreased connectivity between regions associated with descending pain modulation. In exploratory analyses, some of these connections were additionally associated with symptom burden: sensory sensitivity, number of painful regions, and pain interference. This work may inform mechanisms of persistent symptom burden and guide surgical decision-making in patients with high central sensitization. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-10-06T06:07:52.081803+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK