Effect of sequential cleavage and blastocyst embryo transfer compared to single cleavage stage embryo transfer on assisted reproductive technology outcome: An RCT.

OA: gold CC-BY-NC-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-20 · read from full text

This randomized clinical trial in 140 women undergoing fresh IVF/ICSI with 2–5 day-2 cleavage-stage embryos compared a single-step transfer of two cleavage-stage embryos versus sequential fresh transfer (one cleavage-stage ET followed by one blastocyst ET) using an antagonist stimulation protocol. The sequential approach resulted in significantly higher clinical pregnancy (36.5% vs 13.6%) and chemical pregnancy (41.3% vs 18.2%), with early abortion rates differing numerically but not reaching statistical significance (13% vs 44.4%, p=0.053); one ectopic pregnancy occurred in the sequential group. A key limitation highlighted by the authors is that in 14 sequential cases, no blastocyst was available to proceed to the second step, reducing transfer completeness compared with the intended protocol. This paper includes women whose infertility causes can include endometriosis, and it reports ART outcome comparisons relevant to patients with endometriosis within the study population.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BackgroundAssisted reproductive technology (ART), offers hope for many infertile couples by increasing the chance of successful pregnancy. The success of in vitro fertilization depends on various factors, in which embryo transfer (ET) is one of the critical steps influencing in vitro fertilization success rates. Extended embryo culture and blastocyst-stage ET have been considered in ART due to their potential benefits including improved implantation rates.ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the outcomes of sequential ET vs single cleavage-stage ET in women undergoing a fresh ET cycle with a limited number of embryos.Materials and methodsThis randomized clinical trial was conducted on 140 women undergoing infertility treatments and candidates for fresh ET at the Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd, Iran from August 2023 to January 2024. Women with a number of embryos from 2-5 ( ≥ 2 and ≤ 5 available embryos) were randomly divided into 2 groups: One group underwent sequential ET (one cleavage-stage ET followed by one blastocyst ET) and the other group underwent single-step 2 cleavage-stage ET. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy, and the secondary outcome included chemical pregnancy and early abortion rates.ResultsOur findings showed significantly higher rates of clinical (33.5% vs 13.6%, p = 0.003) and chemical (41.3% vs 18.2%, p = 0.004) pregnancies in the sequential ET group compared to the single-step cleavage ET group. The early abortion rate was higher in single-step cleavage ET (13% vs 44.4%, p = 0.053).ConclusionSequential fresh ET is a useful choice in women who have a limited number of embryos and can improve ART outcomes.
Full text 14,170 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 2 sections · click to expand

Section

M.E.: Study design and protocol. M.E., N.H., S.A., F.B.: Conducted the procedures and data analysis. E.M. was responsible for embryologic procedures. Every author took part in the literature review, helped in drafting the manuscript, gave their approval to the finished version of the manuscript, and assumed accountability for the data's integrity.

Coi Statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-23T09:30:01.253652+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0