The Makings of a Modern Epidemic: Endometriosis, Gender and Politics
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 6 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This book critically assesses the social, political, and theoretical dimensions of endometriosis, exploring how shifting ideas about gender and health have shaped this neglected disease.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Since its ‘discovery’ some 150 years ago, thinking about endometriosis has changed. With current estimates identifying it as more common than breast and ovarian cancer, this chronic, incurable gynaecological condition has emerged as a ‘modern epidemic’, distinctive in being perhaps the only global epidemic peculiar to women. This timely book addresses the scholarly neglect of endometriosis by the social sciences, offering a critical assessment of one of the world’s most common - and burdensome - health problems for women. Drawing on a range of theoretical perspectives, including science and technology studies, feminist theory and queer theory, The Makings of a Modern Epidemic explores the symbolic, discursive and material dimensions of the condition. It demonstrates how shifts in thinking about gender, the body, race, modernity and philosophies of health have shaped the epidemic, and produces a compelling account of endometriosis as a highly politicised and grossly neglected disease. Drawing upon rich empirical data, including in-depth interviews with women who have endometriosis and medical and self-help literature, this ground-breaking volume will appeal to scholars and students across the social sciences with interests in gender studies, science and technology studies and the sociology and anthropology of medicine, health and the body.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (2-hop)
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]
Cited by (6)
- Self-tracking in endometriosis: Evolving expectations around a gynecological app developed by a Finnish patient organization 2025
- Chronic pain across clinical settings: the changing understanding of pain and its treatment in endometriosis 2025
- Slippery Knowledge: Ignorance, Ecologies, and Environment in Endometriosis Framing 2025
- “I wish I didn’t have to defend myself for not being in pain all the time”: Healthcare Interactions between People with Endometriosis and General Practitioners about Therapeutic Cannabis Use: A Narrative Analysis 2024
- The missed disease? Endometriosis as an example of 'undone science' 2021
- Men, chronic illness and healthwork: accounts from male partners of women with endometriosis 2020
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK