[Are Hegar's rods omissible? (author's transl)].

In: Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 1979 · vol. 39(1) , pp. 43–5 · PMID:369941 · W2437826114
article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed

Abstract

The widening effect of Sulproston 500 microgram IM on the cervix uteri was investigated in a double-blind study conducted in 50 non-pregnant volunteers. In women in the postmenopausal stage who had been given Sulproston, resistance-free widening of the cervix with Hegar's rods was H 8.33 +/- 0.87. Easy passage of the cervix uteri and of the internal os uteri was achieved with Hegar 8.22 +/- 0.66 in the first half of the cycle and with Hegar 8.35 +/- 3.06 in the second half of the cycle. In all three groups, the size of the rods was significantly smaller following intramuscular application of physiological saline solution. The widening effect of PGE2 or PGE2 derivatives on the cervix, which has been known for quite some time in patients with pregnant uterus, applies in equal measure to the non-pregnant cyclic uterus and to the postmenopausal uterus.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK