Abstract
Aim: The present study aims at the determination of presentation and prevalence of endometriosis in the Kotri
Pakistan.
Study design: A cross sectional study
Place and duration: This study was conducted at SESSI Hospital SITE Kotri, Pakistan from June 2019 to July
2020.
Methodology: A total of 800 patients were admitted to the gynecology ward. A total of 160 patients were
suspected to have endometriosis as their signs and symptoms w ere indicative of the disease . The age r ange of
the patients was from 17 to 48 years. All the patients underwent laparotomy or laparoscopy for diagnosis and
treatment. Individual proforma was filled for all the patients according to the severity of the disease. The stage of
the disease for each patient was identified as per American Fertility Society endometriosis staging.
Results
The symptoms of endometriosis were prevalent in 160 (20%) of the 800 patients who had been admitted
to the ward. A total of 40 (25%) were diagnosed with endometriosis on laparoscopy/laparotomy.
Conclusion
The overall prevalence of endometriosis seen during the study period was 5%. Endometriosis is a
common women's health issue in the population of Pakistan. Nonetheless, it is underestimated. Its prevalence is
high in patients between the ages of 21 years to 30 y ears. The most common presentation of endometriosis is
infertility. A diagnostic laparoscopy must be performed in patients who present with symptoms suggestive of
endometriosis. Timely diagnosis and treatment can help in reproduction.
Keywords
Endometriosis, infertility, laparoscopy, laparotomy
Introduction
Endometriosis is a painful disease in which tissue of the
endometrium tends to grow outside the uterus. It most
commonly involves the ovaries. Other common sites are
fallopian tubes and tissues of the pelvic lining. On rare
occasions, it also seems to involve extra-pelvic organs. The
tissue of endometriosis has a functional similarity with the
endometrial tissue. Hence, its thickness increases with
each menstrual cycle and similarly, it breaks down and
then bleeds [1]. However, unlike original endometrial
tissue, endometriosis cannot escape the cavity in which is it
situated. The debris keeps collecting and can form a cyst.
A cyst of endometriosis formed in the ovaries is called an
endometrioma. The othe r normal tissues of the body
surrounding an endometrioma can form scars and
adhesions [1].
The symptoms of endometriosis are majorly
associated with menstrual periods. Endometriosis has the
potential of causing severe pain, especially during
menstruation. However, the severity of the pain is not an
indication of the extent of the disease. Endometriosis
patients often complain of dyspareunia. During a menstrual
cycle, feeling pain with bowel movements and urination is
also common in most patients. Patients experience
excessive bleeding during menstruation and bleeding
between two cycles [2]. The worst and most common
outcome of the disease is infertility. Other symptoms of
endometriosis include diarrhea, bloating, constipation,
fatigue, and nausea. These sy mptoms are aggravated
during menstruation. Endometriosis can be mistaken for
pelvic inflammatory disease, ovarian cyst, and irritable
bowel syndrome due to overlapping symptoms.
There are many explanations for the causes of
endometriosis. One theory sugg ests that during
menstruation, the shed off part of the endometrium moves
to fallopian tubes through a retrograde movement and
reaches in the pelvic cavity rather than moving out of the
body. The endometrial tissue adheres to the pelvic cavity
and starts t hickening and bleeding there with eac h
menstrual cycle. The 'induction theory' suggests that the
normal tissue of the peritoneal cavity starts functioning like
endometrial tissue under the influence of hormones. The
hormones can also transform the embryonic cells into
endometrial cells during puberty giving rise to
endometriosis. In some instances, the endometrial tissue
adheres to a surgical incision followed by a C -section or a
hysterectomy. Another theory suggests that the lymphatic
system or blo od vessels can transport the endometrial
tissue from the uterus to other parts of the body [3].
There are several risk factors that increase the
chances of occurrence of endometriosis. Some of them are
null parity, puberty at a younger age, late menopaus e,
menstrual cycle shorter than 27 days, heavy menstruation
for over seven days, high level of estrogen in the body, low
BMI, family history of endometriosis, and any other disorder
related to the reproductive system. Infertility is the most
N. Naqvi, R. Imtiaz, R. Perveen et al
P J M H S Vol. 16, No.01, JAN 2022 1025
gruesome compl ication of endometriosis. Endometriosis
may obstruct the fallopian tubes and hence disrupt the
process of ovulation. Despite that, patients with mild or
moderate endometriosis can conceive. Endometriosis
increases the risk of ovarian cancer. The patients c an
rarely develop endometriosis -associated adenocarcinoma
later in life [4].
The diagnosis of endometriosis is built based on
clinical symptoms, pelvic examination, and some
investigations such as ultrasound, magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI), and diagnost ic laparoscopy [5].
Laparoscopy helps in the identification of the size, location,
and extent of endometrial implants. Depending on the size
of the implant, treatment can also be done during
laparoscopy. Other modes of treatment are analgesics,
hormonal therapy, removal of the implant through surgery,
and even hysterectomy in severe cases [6]. The present
study was conducted to determine the presentation and
prevalence of endometriosis in the population of Kotri
presented at SESSI Hospital SITE Kotri, Pakistan.
METHODOLOGY
This cross-sectional study was conducted in the
Gynecology and Obstetrics department of SESSI Hospital
SITE Kotri, Pakistan from June 2019 to July 2020. During
this whole duration, 800 patients were admitted to the
gynecology ward. Out of those, 160 (20%) had signs and
symptoms strongly suggestive o f endometriosis and were
selected for the study. The ages of the pat ients ranged
from 17 to 48 years. Inclusion criteria for the study were the
presence of symptoms such as secondary dysmenorrhe a,
infertility, deep dyspareunia, no response to ibuprofen, and
abnormal uterine bleeding. Furthermore, patients were
examined and those patients who had lesions in the
vaginal wall on examination, cervical lesions, fixed adnexal
mass, nodular uterosacral ligament, and induration in cul -
de-sac were included in the study. Exclusion criteria
included no history of the treatment of endometriosis and
patients who did not sign the consent. Written informed
consent was taken from all the p atients beforehand. They
explained the procedure of laparoscopy and laparotomy. All
the participants were educated an d counseled about the
disease and its outcomes.
A detailed history regarding symptoms was taken
from all the patients. Demographic data including age,
weight, edu cation, socio -economic status, parity,
contraceptive history, menstrual history, treatment history,
and previous investigations were also recorded. Patients
were examined for the signs of endometriosis. The data
was recorded on individual pr oforma. The cri teria set for
laparoscopy were the appearance of mulberry spots,
stellate scars, powder burns, chocolate cysts in the
ovary/ovaries, and dense adhesions. Laparotomy was to
be done on the patients who had been diagnosed clinically
and had a histopathology report.
Stage Extent of disease Points
Stage-I Minimal 1-5
Stage-II Mild 6-15
Stage-III Moderate 16-40
Stage-IV Severe >40
The disease was classified as per the staging system
of the American Fertility Society after and points were given
after an assessment of depth and size of the lesions, and
severity of endometrial adhesions. There were four stages
in the patients that were classified as in the following table.
Results
A total of 800 patients were admitted to the gynecology
ward from June 2019 to July 2020.
Total 160 (20%) out of them were suspected to have
endometriosis. Out of those who had positive history and
clinical symptoms of endometriosis, 40 (25%) had
confirmation of diagnosis on laparotomy or laparoscopy.
None of the patients was diagnosed with cervical or vaginal
wall endometriosis. Hence, the overall prevalence of
endometriosis seen during the study period was 5%. The
distribution of the patients according to the age is given in
table 1.
Table 1: Participants’ distribution according to age
Age group
(Years)
Total population Population with
endometriosis
Number Percentage Number Percentage
17-20 3 1.87 1 2.5
21-30 121 75.63 32 80
31-40 30 18.75 6 15
41-48 6 3.75 1 2.5
Total 160 40
Table 2: Participants’ distribution according to weight
Weight
group (Kg)
Total population Population with
endometriosis
Number Percentage Number Percentage
Below 50 10 62.5 2 5
50-60 119 74.37 30 75
61-70 20 12.5 7 17.5
Above 71 11 6.87 1 2.5
Total 160 40
Table 3: Participants’ distribution according to parity
Parity Number of patients Percentage
Nulliparous 29 72.5
1-3 children 9 22.5
More than 3 children 2 5
Total 40
Table 4: Patients’ distribution according to the staging of disease
according to AFS
Stage Severity of
disease
Number of
patients
Percentage
Stage I Minimal 1 2.5
Stage II Mild 15 37.5
Stage III Moderate 13 32.5
Stage IV Severe 11 27.5
Total 40
The majority of the patients (80%) were between the
ages of 21 years to 30 years. Only 1 patient was above the
age of 40 and 1 below the age of 20 years. 75% of patients
weighed 50kg to 60 kg. Only one patient weighed 70 kg.
The distribution of weight and parity is given in table 2 and
table 3. Most of the patients were nulliparous.
Endometriosis was the probable cause of infertility in those
patients. Classification of the patients based on the staging
Assessment of Presentation and Prevalence of Endometriosis in the Population of Kotri Pakistan: A Cross Sectional Study
1026 P J M H S Vol. 16, No.01, JAN 2022
system of the American Fertility Society is given in t able 4.
Out of the total of 40 confirmed patients with endometriosis,
most of the patients (37.5%) had mild disease and only one
had the minimal disease. 11 (27.5%) patients had severe
disease. Patients in Stage III and IV involved the uterus,
ovaries, fallopian tubes, and peritoneum. Moreover, there
was obliteration in the Pouch of Douglas, deep -seated
lesions, and multiple adhesions in the gut.
Discussion
According to the results of the present study, endometriosis
is 25% prevalent out of all the patie nts that were admitted
in the gynecology ward with suspicion of endometriosis . A
similar study was conduct ed by Meuleman et al in which
they had included 220 infertile women and performed
diagnostic laparoscopy on all the participants. They found
that the prevalence of endometriosis in their study was
47%. They concluded that all of the participants needed
reproductive surgery since a large number of patients were
diagnosed with endometriosis [7].
Nazir et al studied the length of the menstrual cycle in
endometriosis. They included 50 women who were married
and had been diagnosed with endometriosis by diagnostic
laparoscopy. They concluded that there was a strong
correlation between the short length of the menstrual cycle
and endometriosis [8 ]. Jefout et a l conducted a study to
find out the association of endometriosis and pelvic pain in
the population under study. The study included 28 females
with chronic pelvic pain. 20 of them were diagnosed with
endometriosis. Hence they concluded that there was a
strong association between chronic pelvic pain and
endometriosis. They also observed the prevalence of cold
intolerance in patients with endometriosis [9].
Reid et al conducted a similar study to the present
one to identify the prevalence of endometriosis in the
Australian population. The sample size was as large as
2025 women. The percentage prevalence determined was
3.4%. They concluded that endometriosis is a common
health issue in women and needs special ackno wledgment
[10]. Bean et al conducted a study t o assess the incidence
of endometriosis in pregnant women. They included a total
of 1341 women who had visited the clinic for early
pregnancy ultrasounds. 5% of the pregnant women were
diagnosed with endometriosis. Half of them were
diagnosed with endometr iosis for the first time. They
concluded that ultrasound is a beneficial to ol to diagnose
endometriosis [11 ]. However, it is not always the case.
Diagnostic laparoscopy is the most reliable and authentic
Method
of diagnosis [12]. According to the study of Okoth
et al, women with endometriosis are at great risk of
cardiovascular diseases [13].
Conclusion
The overall prevalence of endometriosis seen during the
study period was 5%. Endometriosis is a common women's
health issue in the population of Kotri Pakistan.
Nonetheless, it is underestimated. Its prevalence is high in
patients between the ages of 21 years to 30 years. The
most common presentation of endometriosis is infertility. A
diagnostic laparoscopy must be performed in patients who
present with symptoms suggestive of endometriosis. Timely
diagnosis and treatment can help in reproduction.
Permission: It was taken from the ethical review
committee of the institute
Funding source: None
Conflict of interest: None
References
1. Wang Y, Nicholes K, Shih IM. The origin and pathogenesis
of endometriosis. Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms
of Disease. 2020; 15:71-95.
2. Laganà AS, Garzon S, Götte M, Viganò P, Franchi M,
Ghezzi F, Martin DC. The pathogenesis of endometriosis:
molecular and cell biol ogy insights. International journal of
molecular sciences. 2019 Jan; 20(22):5615.
3. Hill CJ, Fakhreldin M, Maclean A, Dobson L, Nancarrow L,
Bradfield A, Choi F, Daley D, Tempest N, Hapangama DK.
Endometriosis and the fallopian tubes: Theories of origin and
clinical implications. Journal of clinical medicine. 2020 Jun ;
9(6):1905.
4. Tetikkurt S, Çelik E, Taş H, Cay T, Isık S, Usta AT.
Coexistence of adenomyosis, adenocarcinoma, endometrial
and myometrial lesions in resected uterine specimens.
Molecular and clinical oncology. 2018; 9(2):231-7.
5. Agarwal SK, Chapron C, Giudice LC, Laufer MR, Leyland N,
Missmer SA, Singh SS, Taylor HS. Clinical diagnosis of
endometriosis: a call to action. American journal of obstetrics
and gynecology. 2019; 220(4):354-e1.
6. Ferrero S, Evangelisti G, Barra F. Current and emerging
treatment options for endometriosis. Expert opinio n on
pharmacotherapy. 2018; 19(10):1109-25.
7. Meuleman C, Vandenabeele B, Fieuws S, Spiessens C,
Timmerman D, D'Hooghe T. High prevalence of
endometriosis in infer tile women with normal ovulation and
normospermic partners. Fertility and sterility. 2009; 92(1):68-
74.
8. Nazir S, Khan R, Khalid A, Ahmad G, Khalid P. menstrual
cycle length in females with endometriosis. Journal of
Medical Sciences. 2019; 27(4):356-8.
9. Al-Jefout M, Alnawaiseh N, Yaghi S, Alqaisi A. Prevalence of
endometriosis and its symptoms among young Jordanian
women with chronic pelvic pain refractory to conventional
therapy. Journal of Obstetrics an d Gynaecology Canada.
2018; 40(2):165-70.
10. Reid R, Steel A, Wardle J, McIntyre E, Harnett J, Foley H,
Adams J. The prevalence of self -reported diagnosed
endometriosis in the Australian population: results from a
nationally-representative survey. BMC research notes. 2019;
12(1):1-6.
11. Bean E, Naflalin J, Horne A, Saridogan E, Cutner A, Jurkovic
D. An ultrasound study of the prevalence of endometriosis in
women attending for early pregnancy assessment: a
prospective observational study. Authorea Preprints. 2020
Dec 1.
12. Wykes CB, Clark TJ, Khan KS. Accuracy of laparos copy in
the diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic quantitative
review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &
Gynaecology. 2004 Nov; 111(11):1204-12.
13. Okoth K, Wang J, Zemedikun D, Thomas GN,
Nirantharakumar K, Adderley NJ. Risk of cardiovascular
outcomes among women with endometriosis in the United
Kingdom: a retrospective matched cohort study. BJOG: An
International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2021 Mar
8.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.